Slite vs. XWiki

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Slite
Score 5.5 out of 10
N/A
Slite is a knowledge base designed to provide teams with needed answers even without searching. From onboarding guides to all hands notes, Slite keeps all types of company information centralised.
$10
per month per member
XWiki
Score 8.2 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
XWiki is an open-source collaborative platform designed to enhance business collaboration and streamline knowledge management for companies of all sizes. As a an alternative to proprietary knowledge bases, XWiki offers a structured second-generation wiki with over 900 pre-made extensions, enabling businesses to add features and customize their XWiki instance to meet specific needs. Key features and benefits: Structured wiki concept: XWiki organizes knowledge…
$300
per year 10 users
Pricing
SliteXWiki
Editions & Modules
Standard
$10
per month per member
Premium
$15
per month per member
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Starter
€300
per year for up to 10 users
On-Premise
Custom Pricing
(Pro Plans available for On-Premise deployment)
Basic
starting at €1443
per year for up to 25 users
Business
starting at €10890
per year for up to 250 users
Enterprise
starting at €33000
per year for up to 500 users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SliteXWiki
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.Discount available for multi-year pricing and higher user volumes. Up to a 50% discount available for NGOs and institutions of higher learning.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SliteXWiki
Best Alternatives
SliteXWiki
Small Businesses
Front
Front
Score 9.0 out of 10
Front
Front
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SliteXWiki
Likelihood to Recommend
5.1
(4 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
6.5
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SliteXWiki
Likelihood to Recommend
Slite
It is well suited for entire companies to use not just small teams because you can create so many workspaces and folders which allow better organization for a centralized space. For example, if you want to create for one team a folder thats a Social Media Marketing Hub you can have that with supportive resources, documents, meet the team section, and so much more. You can have another folder for other teams like HR and HR Resources where everyone has visibility into the documents and anything added under that section. It's super helpful.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
XWiki is very well suited for a very wide range of web collaboration and web development.
Read full review
Pros
Slite
  • Templates for meeting notes
  • Cross-functional collaboration
  • Search and retrieval of content
  • Summarizing recent activity
Read full review
XWiki SAS
  • XWiki makes it easy to manage semi-structured information, which is at the heart of every knowledge nexus of organizations. It makes it easy to manage in a single system both structured data (such as memberships, projects), and unstructured data.
  • XWiki offers a very rich API for creating enterprise applications quickly that are easy to maintain and evolve collaboratively.
  • XWiki templating and skinning system is extremely flexible and powerful.
Read full review
Cons
Slite
  • I don't love that it doesn't integrate easily with the other tools we use, at least it doesn't as far as I know.
  • Since there is not an Excel sort of capability there is no way it could ever replace Google, so it is sometimes easier to just use Word docs instead of Slite since everything is in one place.
  • I think if Slite extended their product line up, it would be more attractive to use exclusively, instead of just using it for documentation.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
  • While the basic pieces are available for turning XWiki into an advanced semantic system, some features could be made available more prominently to the user for easing the use of faceted and typed links, paving the way for a new era of collaborative knowledge sharing.
Read full review
Usability
Slite
Very clean interface however editing can be a challenge which is a big part of using it so I can't give a 10 until the editing and customization for editing is improved. I love how minimal the look and feel is though and how easy it is to organize different pages and folders.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Slite
[In my opinion,] Slite is cheaper but less mature and feature full. Notion is a much more mature solution, so I'd recommend it for teams who want to be at the front and don't care about cost.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
XWiki key differentiators in my opinion:
  • Fast app development framework with very rich API
  • Open-source strategy, opening the way to collaborative innovation
Read full review
Return on Investment
Slite
  • Positive ... Eng. Started using this and the rest of product adopted
Read full review
XWiki SAS
  • XWiki has a positive impact on the OW2 communication and collaborations strategies. It saves time when developing applications.
Read full review
ScreenShots

XWiki Screenshots

Screenshot of an XWiki homepageScreenshot of knowledge management, in XWiki.Screenshot of the granular rights access feature, that helps users to manage big teams.Screenshot of some of the customizations available in every aspect of an instance, from theme to templates and page structure.Screenshot of an example of migration from Confluence using the dedicated migrator.