BitBar vs. Testlum

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BitBar
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
BitBar allows users to test applications across the latest and most popular real browsers and devices. Users can scale testing by increasing test coverage and decreasing test execution time by running automated tests in parallel across browsers and devices. BitBar integrates with the user's current tech stack or CI/CD pipeline. Key Features: * BitBar offers one cloud for all testing platforms whether it be web, native, or hybrid applications. * Test an application across real…
$39
per month
Testlum
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Testlum is a low-code testing tool with an XML-based structure designed to provide ease of use and efficiency for QA specialists.N/A
Pricing
BitBarTestlum
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BitBarTestlum
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsEnterprise packages are available for larger teams and customers.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BitBarTestlum
Features
BitBarTestlum
Automation Testing
Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
BitBar
-
Ratings
Testlum
10.0
3 Ratings
18% above category average
Record and Automate00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Multi-Browser Testing00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Mobile Testing00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Test Scheduling00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Test Management00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Integrated Version Control00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Parallel Testing00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Object Recognition00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Testing Collaboration00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Real Device Testing00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BitBarTestlum
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
Enterprises
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BitBarTestlum
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(6 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
BitBarTestlum
Likelihood to Recommend
SmartBear
CrossBrowserTesting is a great tool to use when you have a new page or new content that you want to test on an array of devices/browsers. In the diverse online world nowadays, it is nearly impossible to ensure optimization for every case. CBT allows you to get closer to that goal.
Read full review
Testlum
Testlum is particularly well-suited for automating regression and functional testing in projects with a well-defined structure. For example, we’ve effectively used it to automate all testing processes for our education platform. Its unlimited integration capabilities and that we could add custom integrations helped us a lot. We’ve found that Testlum provides great support for all testing needs, and we have no problems maintaining test stability.
Read full review
Pros
SmartBear
  • Allows me to test on our development server with ease which is behind a firewall.
  • Using automation for my tests.
  • Screenshots of the problems on each page.
  • Ability to jump between screen sizes quickly.
Read full review
Testlum
No answers on this topic
Cons
SmartBear
  • Test case support is somewhat limited in customization ability.
  • Not a unique problem to them (or their 'fault'), but content behind VPN or intranet cannot be scanned.
  • Pricing with tier level and features can sometimes be confusing (ie. what is and what is not included).
Read full review
Testlum
No answers on this topic
Usability
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Testlum
We would like to share a good experience using Testlum
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
SmartBear
Selenium: 1. Selenium is Open source tool 2. Needs proper framework development and integration with multiple 3rd party tools 3. Not much secure 4. Needs scripting knowledge for people working on it 5. takes time and effort CrossBrowser Testing: 1. Licensed , so secure 2. Less time , less effort 3. Quick results 4. No scripting language knowledge needed 5. More coverage 6. Without any framework creation also we can test on multiple devices/browsers
Read full review
Testlum
Due to the fact that Testlum is a low-code tool, which really makes it easier to work with it. It was also a recommendation from our partners.
Read full review
Return on Investment
SmartBear
  • By using CrossBrowserTesting we are saving many hours a week in manual work hours.
  • Our automated Selenium tests run in a fraction of the time it takes to manually test our components, so we can spend more time building great user experiences and less time triaging bugs.
Read full review
Testlum
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots