<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring#question3' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>Customer Verified: Read more.</a>
Top Rated
155 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring#question3' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>Customer Verified: Read more.</a>
21 Ratings

ReadyAPI

<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring#question3' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>Customer Verified: Read more.</a>
Top Rated
155 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.7 out of 100

Tricentis qTest

<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring#question3' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>Customer Verified: Read more.</a>
21 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 5.1 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

    Test Management

    ReadyAPI

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    6.7

    Tricentis qTest

    67%
    Tricentis qTest ranks higher in 5/5 features

    Centralized test management

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.2
    82%
    10 Ratings

    Manage test hosts and schedules

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    5.3
    53%
    6 Ratings

    Map tests to user stories

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    7.0
    70%
    7 Ratings

    Test execution reporting

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    6.3
    63%
    9 Ratings

    Defect management

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    6.5
    65%
    5 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • ReadyAPI is rated higher in 5 areas: Likelihood to Recommend, Likelihood to Renew, Usability, Support Rating, Implementation Rating

    Likelihood to Recommend

    8.6

    ReadyAPI

    86%
    67 Ratings
    3.5

    Tricentis qTest

    35%
    12 Ratings

    Likelihood to Renew

    7.5

    ReadyAPI

    75%
    18 Ratings
    4.0

    Tricentis qTest

    40%
    2 Ratings

    Usability

    9.9

    ReadyAPI

    99%
    3 Ratings
    8.0

    Tricentis qTest

    80%
    1 Rating

    Availability

    9.0

    ReadyAPI

    90%
    2 Ratings

    Tricentis qTest

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Performance

    8.0

    ReadyAPI

    80%
    2 Ratings

    Tricentis qTest

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Support Rating

    7.9

    ReadyAPI

    79%
    11 Ratings
    1.0

    Tricentis qTest

    10%
    1 Rating

    Implementation Rating

    7.0

    ReadyAPI

    70%
    3 Ratings
    5.0

    Tricentis qTest

    50%
    1 Rating

    Product Scalability

    7.0

    ReadyAPI

    70%
    1 Rating

    Tricentis qTest

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    ReadyAPI

    As stated, we do a LOT of API testing, the swaggerhub import makes it easy to add APIs. This is very well-suited, as well as easy management of the steps/cases/suites inside of ReadyAPI. The one thing I do wish ReadyAPI was better suited for is changes to data, we have a lot of test cases in ReadyAPI and if we make a change to how the backend data is structured, one-by-one adjustments need to be made to the steps. Less appropriate, UI testing.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Tricentis qTest

    I've only used the Tricentis qTest Explorer portion of Tricentis qTest (I recall some of the test management stuff being too clunky and prescribed to fit our workflow, so we chose a different tool). It's well suited for automatically capturing screenshots of browser-based or Windows-based applications during test sessions. However, we've had difficulty getting it to work well in other contexts, such as inside a Virtual Machine or on Linux.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Pros

    ReadyAPI

    • Different Load testing techniques with variable loads and settings allowing to load test your service in different ways.
    • Assertions are much easier to use by inspecting responses, especially xpath assertions.
    • Exporting test scripts and linking them on jenkins.
    • Modern and user friendly GUI compared to free version.
    • Running test scripts in parallel.
    Ahmed Amer | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Tricentis qTest

    • Highly customizable: we were able to organize our test cases in unique ways that made our work easier.
    • Connectivity with Jira: being able to pull requirements information in from Jira was a big point for us.
    • Standalone tool: Being a standalone tool on a dedicated server, we were able to have access to our tests regardless of whether our Jira server was down.
    Kagen Wilkinson | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Cons

    ReadyAPI

    • Sometimes Ready API Test performs poorly or freezes when REST response contains a lot of data
    • Performance Tests documentation could be updated to describe different assertion points with examples of usage.
    • Ability to disable certain test steps only in the Performance Tests section, while leaving them on for Functional Tests could be added.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Tricentis qTest

    • Data query is slow for large projects (64109 test cases). It's not usable because the screen won't even load.
    • It would be nice to be able to add user to groups directly within the individual user Action menu. Instead of having to create user, assign projects, then go to Groups to add the user.
    • Some simple filtering with the search function or make it context based. So that if I am in Test Design tab, and I run a search, provide results for TC's only. Right now it returns everything from Requirements and Test Runs, etc.
    Adrian Tang | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Pricing Details

    ReadyAPI

    General

    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    Yes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    Tricentis qTest

    General

    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Entry-level set up fee?
    Optional

    Starting Price

    $1,000 per year per user

    Likelihood to Renew

    ReadyAPI

    ReadyAPI 7.5
    Based on 18 answers
    The only reason this isn't a '10' is because of the cost. This product is definitely meant for organizations who are serious about making sure they invest in the full ecosystem of API design, development, maintenance. But there is a significant cost associated with this investment. and because of this cost (and the non-tangible output for executives), it is a difficult line-item to justify in this post-pandemic environment.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Tricentis qTest

    Tricentis qTest 4.0
    Based on 2 answers
    This has been a core QA management tool for our organization and integrates well with our other SDLC platforms (Azure DevOps/Jira/Katalon).
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Usability

    ReadyAPI

    ReadyAPI 9.9
    Based on 3 answers
    SoapUI allows us to combine multiple tests and adhere
    to the sequence that they need to run in order to complete successfully.
    It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very
    good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing
    Christopher Saleh | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Tricentis qTest

    Tricentis qTest 8.0
    Based on 1 answer
    qTest is actually intuitive and user-friendly, despite my other scathing review aspects
    Nick Larsen | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Reliability and Availability

    ReadyAPI

    ReadyAPI 9.0
    Based on 2 answers
    Soap UI has managed to continuously build on it's solid foundation and keep improving by each release. It is by far the most dependable and accurate testing tool out there of its kind. Available via connecting to VM's created as SoapUI test machines give access to it anytime, anywhere practically.
    Christopher Saleh | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Tricentis qTest

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Performance

    ReadyAPI

    ReadyAPI 8.0
    Based on 2 answers
    It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very
    good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing.
    Christopher Saleh | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Tricentis qTest

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Support Rating

    ReadyAPI

    ReadyAPI 7.9
    Based on 11 answers
    To be honest, we didnt had much issues with the support, as there is already plenty of online communities available for help. But if ever there were some minor issues with the membership or the certificates, the tech support was always quick and efficient enough to resolve the issue ASAP
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Tricentis qTest

    Tricentis qTest 1.0
    Based on 1 answer
    The actual answer is 0. I have never experienced worse support, whether personal or professional
    Nick Larsen | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Implementation Rating

    ReadyAPI

    ReadyAPI 7.0
    Based on 3 answers
    no very easy but lacks documentation
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Tricentis qTest

    Tricentis qTest 5.0
    Based on 1 answer
    Again, supporting documentation could have been a lot better
    Nick Larsen | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Alternatives Considered

    ReadyAPI

    ReadyAPI provides intuitive GUI capabilities compared to their own open source product. When compared to Postman, ReadyAPI also supports SOAP based services, which is a saver especially when integrating with legacy or other third party systems.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Tricentis qTest

    We felt like for the feature set and due to the fact it was mid-range on the cost, it was a good choice. It also has some other plugins which we plan to utilize at some point like Tosca.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Scalability

    ReadyAPI

    ReadyAPI 7.0
    Based on 1 answer
    It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very
    good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing. However, I have read that added monitoring tools have been added, which if so the 7 could possibly go to a 8 or 9.
    Christopher Saleh | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Tricentis qTest

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Return on Investment

    ReadyAPI

    • We were able to achieve our needs in API test automation with the tool
    • In terms ROI, I would say that we have gotten what is basically needed
    • Though the initial setup was tough, after that we were able to continue it with user friendly UI and reporting.
    • Overall, it had [a] neutral impact in terms [of] ROI.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Tricentis qTest

    • Better organization and centralization of test cases has led to more cohesive team collaboration
    • Speed to delivery, deployments to production, are mostly maintained
    • Performance issues have led to testing delays requiring the team to switch to other methods which contributed to QA bottleneck issues and sometimes even missed sprint commitments
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Screenshots

    Add comparison