GitKraken vs. SprintGround

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GitKraken
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
GitKraken's commit graph helps visualize branch structure and commit history. It helps verify recent Git actions on the repo, and also shows who made what code changes and when, so it’s easier to track down when a bug was introduced and revert back to a previous version. GitKraken Client is a Git GUI that detects and alerts users of potential conflicts so as to prevent them from happening. With itsuser Activity Status, the user can know who is online in the GitKraken Client.N/A
SprintGround
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
SprintGround is a task management, project tracking and collaboration tool for software development teams and enthusiasts. This solution provides a centralized platform to organize IT development projects, coordinate work, track time, monitor progress, plan releases and keep all team members up to date with email notifications and dashboards. SprintGround supports methodologies like Scrum and Kanban. Utilities like Task board, Planning board and Burndown charts provide easy to…
$0
Pricing
GitKrakenSprintGround
Editions & Modules
Hosted by GitKraken
Customized according to the amount of team members.
Free
$0
Enterprise
$5.50
user / month
Starter
$29
month
Business
$69
month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GitKrakenSprintGround
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GitKrakenSprintGround
Considered Both Products
GitKraken
Chose GitKraken
Updated technology and ease of use make GitKraken stand out against other products we've used in the past.
Chose GitKraken
I actually like Jira better, to me the UI is a lot cleaner. Easier to use, and search tickets.
Chose GitKraken
We are currently using all three listed above in conjunction with Axosoft. Both Jira and Axosoft are currently being used for the same purpose as we try and identify which product is better suited for us. We use GitHub and Slack in conjunction with Axosoft but not in the same …
SprintGround

No answer on this topic

Features
GitKrakenSprintGround
Version Control Software Features
Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of Product A and Product B
GitKraken
9.9
Ratings
12% above category average
SprintGround
-
Ratings
Branching and Merging10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Version History10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Version Control Collaboration Tools10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Pull Requests10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Review Tools9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Access Control10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Testing Integration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Tracking Integration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Branch Protection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
GitKrakenSprintGround
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.4 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GitKrakenSprintGround
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GitKrakenSprintGround
Likelihood to Recommend
Axosoft is well suited as a project management tool for software teams looking to track workloads. Great tool for categorizing features, tasks, bugs, or a customized category into sprints. Companies can take advantage of the tracking aspects to create burndown charts or just to track employee time. I would say it is less appropriate for small task management like a to-do list type application because it has so many features that would go to waste. Furthermore, Axosoft is more geared towards development teams, but you could use it across departments if needed.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Creating pull request
  • Connection to various services
  • Git flow
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • A bit hard to use, or a steep learning curve. The UI isn't super intuitive at first, it took me awhile to pick it up and I had to get someone to basically show me what they recommend I set my filters and UI to.
  • This might be a case of improper setup but when making tickets, there isn't an auto response, so we get a lot of duplicate tickets if a conversation happens on the emails before someone takes the case and replies through OnTime.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Once you get the hang of Axosoft, I think it's easy to use however... getting the hang of it takes quite a bit of time. Additionally, once Axosoft makes an update, it can be difficult to find your bearings again. Like I said, once you know how to use the product, I think it's easy but it takes a bit to become comfortable and confident with Axosoft
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Updated technology and ease of use make GitKraken stand out against other products we've used in the past.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Axosoft has positively affected the time management of our employee resources
  • Axosoft has shown us where we have inefficiencies in the organization
  • Axosoft has allowed us to track projects better, get them out on time allowing for more projects to be scheduled and, in turn, increased our subscriber count.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

GitKraken Screenshots

Screenshot of

SprintGround Screenshots

Screenshot of Home dahsboardScreenshot of Task board (Kanban)Screenshot of Planning boardScreenshot of Task viewScreenshot of Development progress overview