TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) is a Full-Stack Quality Engineering platform that empowers teams to test intelligently and ship faster. Engineered for scale, it offers end-to-end AI agents to plan, author, execute, and analyze software quality. The platform enables testing of web, mobile, and enterprise applications at any scale across real devices, real browsers, and custom real-world environments.
$19
per month Parallel Test
Tigmat
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Tigmat is a
test automation tool used to record tests and run them without
having to write a single line of code.
Tigmat
supports Web, Android, Android Web, and API applications. It provides both a Web Recorder and an Android Recorder, so users don’t
have to bother with code, even though anything can be changed manually.
Test
Execution is supported on more than 60 Real Android Devices, Windows, Linux,
Chrome, Firefox, and Edge for coverage.
There is a free plan…
$0
per month
Pricing
TestMu AI
Tigmat
Editions & Modules
Virtual Live
$19
per month Parallel Test
Real Device Plus Live
$49
per month 1 parallel test
Test Manager
$59
per month per seat
Web Automation on Desktop
$99
per month Parallel Test
Virtual Automation Cloud
$159
per month Parallel Test
HyperExecute Cloud (Multi OS)
$199
per month Parallel Test
Real Device + Automation Cloud
$249
per month Parallel Test
SmartUI Visual Regression
$269
per month Parallel Test
Kane AI (Mobile + Web)
$349
per month Parallel Test
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Parallel Test
HyperExecute On-Premise
Custom Pricing
per parallel test
Free
$0
per month
Basic
$199
per month
Professional
$499
per month
Premium
$999
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
TestMu AI
Tigmat
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Discount available for annual pricing.
each plan gives access to different Web Testing Minutes and Real Device Testing Minutes, Mobile Recorder Minutes and other differences.
For less money, you get premium features as IP Geo location. In our case it was the decision factor to go with TestMu AI, in our case we have a tight budget that didn't allow to go with other cloud device vendors. It has been great the balance between offered features and price
It was a choice out of my hands as based upon budget, but overall the products are very similar, I understand that LambdaTest offers a cheaper option providing the same functionality
The reason I have selected LambdaTest is that earlier I have used BrowserStack in my workflow, but when I got to know from the industry expert about LambdaTest, then I explored it on my own, and I found that it's a very cost-effective and slightly more flexible for our project …
While Browserstack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than Browserstack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while Browserstack does not. Even manual …
What I love most about LambdaTest is the real-time device testing. It makes it so much easier to spot specific issues across different devices, something that's usually tough when you don’t have access to a full range of physical devices. So as compare to the competitors it …
LambdaTest has been a better choice because these platforms lack in many features like the third party integration, availability of number of devices, and most importantly its quicker than all and thats the most important aspect which led to switch LambdaTest, They also provide …
The thing which I like about LambdaTest is it has wide range of devices for both platforms Android as well as iOS, which makes testing a lot easier without actually owning those devices. We can also set different custom configuration for devices which help in testing the edge …
We have used all the products in past but in LambdaTest they are providing all the facility and features in a single application which is really helpful for an organization. Apart from their support during the deploying and customized features for organization specifi makes it …
AWS device farm does not come close to LambdaTest in terms of capability and user expereince in mobile devices testing. Device farm lags a lot and device model updates are slower when compared to LambdaTest.
We select LambdaTest because of its superb features and multi tasking work properties which give us a extremely good working experience with the projects and building client trust at the same time.
As reactnative devs we develop hybrid apps for both ios and Android and testing on different physical devices is very annoying while as with LambdaTest we can just select the virtual device boot that and start testing on the go. No need to keep devices. Sometimes clients report issues and they provide the device name and if available in LambdaTest we can just test and fix the device specific bugs
The reason i have given the 10 points becasue the problem LambdaTest solves is providing access to all devices in one place, allowing developers to identify the same errors they would encounter on real devices. This makes life much easier, especially for developers who regularly face cross-device functionality issues. It's a big plus point that positions LambdaTest as an all-in-one solution.
Using LambdaTest feels pretty straightforward once you get the hang of it. The platform has a clean interface so jumping between different features isn’t much work. things feel smooth in UI automation. It takes some time to understand the overall once that is done it'll become easier. The detailed test logs and visual regression features especially stand out in helping you identify issues quickly without extra effort.
The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us.
While BrowserStack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than BrowserStack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while BrowserStack does not. Even manual testing plans are better priced than BrowserStack’s. In terms of UI and onboarding, we found LambdaTest more user-friendly as well.