Invited by the Vendor
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) | Score8.8 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | TestMu AI (formerly LambdaTest) is a full-stack, AI-native quality engineering platform that lets teams plan, author, execute and analyse software quality in one place, across web, mobile and AI applications. Performance and load testing: TestMu AI runs JMeter .jmx plans and Gatling simulations unchanged, at protocol level, on managed cloud load generators that are provisioned for each run across six regions and removed when it ends, so there is no load… | $19 per month per user |
WebdriverIO | Score9.6 out of 10 | N/A | WebdriverIO, an OpenJS Foundation project, is a next-gen browser and mobile automation test framework for Node.js. It can be run on the WebDriver Protocol for true cross-browser testing as well as Chrome DevTools Protocol for Chromium based automation using Puppeteer. | N/A |
| TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) | WebdriverIO | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Discount available for annual pricing. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) | WebdriverIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 105 Answers | 100% Would buy again 5 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
98% Delivers good value for the price 99 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 107 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 75 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
97% Implementation went as expected 89 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) | WebdriverIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) | WebdriverIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.7 | - |
| Usability | 9.1 | - |
| Availability | 10.0 | - |
| Performance | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 9.0 | - |
| Configurability | 8.0 | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 9.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 10.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 10.0 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.0 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 9.0 | - |
| TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) | WebdriverIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) Screenshots |