Vynamic Security Intrusion Detection vs. Zscaler Internet Access

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Vynamic Security Intrusion Detection
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Diebold Nixdorf offers the Vynamic Security Intrusion Detection and privilege control application to financial institutions and retailers.N/A
Zscaler Internet Access
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Zscaler Internet Access™ (ZIA) is a secure web gateway (SWG), delivering cloud native cyberthreat protection and zero trust access to the internet and SaaS apps.N/A
Pricing
Vynamic Security Intrusion DetectionZscaler Internet Access
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Vynamic Security Intrusion DetectionZscaler Internet Access
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Vynamic Security Intrusion DetectionZscaler Internet Access
Considered Both Products
Vynamic Security Intrusion Detection

No answer on this topic

Zscaler Internet Access
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler Internet Access is a great compliment as they all work together with seamless integration.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Cortex Xpanse by Palo Alto Networks
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
ZCC being one implementation with Zscaler Internet Access and ZPA being on the same app, that made the decision easier, also with the partnership that Zscaler brought to the table.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Netskope Cloud Firewall
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
We keep using the other products, but for network traffic Zscaler Internet Access tends to be the best solution, although for Infoblox we are using their DNS solution, and for CrowdStrike, we are focusing on other items more related to EDR than network.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
I prefer it by far, it works well with integrations, it is built to grow with us, and support us.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler Internet Access is more granular.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Free pov was huge. We didn't get that with Cato.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler Deception
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Scalability and visibility.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
The overall user community and scope of supportability outweighed the others on our short list. Netskope was a close second, but the risk, though small, was greater than that of bringing Zscaler aboard. We were looking for a mature, well-supported, highly functional, and …
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
CrowdStrike Falcon
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
We have differences, but we are happy with Zscaler.
Features
Vynamic Security Intrusion DetectionZscaler Internet Access
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Vynamic Security Intrusion Detection
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
5.0
Ratings
56% below category average
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Vynamic Security Intrusion Detection
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
10.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Vynamic Security Intrusion Detection
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
8.4
Ratings
9% above category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Vynamic Security Intrusion Detection
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
8.8
Ratings
3% above category average
Continuous Verification00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Network Flow Control00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Admin Access Control00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Network Data Encryption00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Vynamic Security Intrusion DetectionZscaler Internet Access
Small Businesses
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
Score 8.0 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Vynamic Security Intrusion DetectionZscaler Internet Access
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Vynamic Security Intrusion DetectionZscaler Internet Access
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
It has been pretty great in our deployment; the ability to send specific messages to users, or to isolate with a banner, has given us more control without blunt "this was blocked for this reason" landing pages. We have a lot of YouTube use, and it's difficult to police the legitimate use from personal use. Because of this, the quotas have been an effective way to achieve traffic goals without getting in users' way.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Provides a secure VPN connection point for endpoint connectivity.
  • Provides the VPN connectivity in a fast and reliable connection state.
  • Very dependable, once connected the connection stays up and there's no fuss.
  • Very good at letting you know when you are not authenticated.
  • Very easy to authenticate and regain access when your session times out.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • ZS CLI support to turn off ZIA and ZDX service specifically on mac.
  • Better visibility into failed posture devices, including a timeline and the reason the posture failed (This is about the Zscaler mobile portal: Enrolled devices --> Failed posture devices).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
While Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA) delivers critical value in cloud security and RBI compliance, I rate renewal likelihood 7/10 due to evolving needs versus platform limitations. Below is my rationale:
Key Gaps:
1. Advanced Threat Costs:
ZIA’s add-ons (e.g., Advanced DLP, Sandboxing) incur 35%+ cost premiums – straining budgets as transaction volumes (UPI/iMobile) grow 50% YoY.
2. API Banking Scalability:
ZIA’s API rate limits throttle real-time policy sync during UPI peaks (10K+ TPS), forcing workarounds for finacle integrations.
3. RBI Future-Proofing:
Limited native support for upcoming digital rupee (CBDC) security rules requires custom development, increasing compliance overhead.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The product is as expected. ZIA has been integrated and utilized as intended. Any modifications to rules in ZCC have been straightforward to implement. Although it has not been done yet, the segmentation for specific users is highly anticipated. The product received a 9, as no product is wholly perfect, but it has been great to use.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
There are often performance issues reported
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Zscaler's ZIA support is quick and knowledgable. They respond within 1-2 hours of you submitting your ticket. They are very thorough and are typically ready to jump on a live troubleshooting session. Our ZIA platform and how we use is it unique so at times tickets can be open for weeks but we alway get quality support compared to other unrelated product support in our enterprise
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
good the engineer give excellent support and eplanation
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
We keep using the other products, but for network traffic Zscaler Internet Access tends to be the best solution, although for Infoblox we are using their DNS solution, and for CrowdStrike, we are focusing on other items more related to EDR than network.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • I would say it has a very good ROI, as whenever someone can't access something, they submit a ticket to our network engineer, and within minutes, the site is safely added to ZIA with best-practice configurations. After seeing a little of the UI from the Zenith event, it seems very user-friendly to control these policies.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Zscaler Internet Access Screenshots

Screenshot of an overview of Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA), a cloud native security service edge (SSE) solution that builds on a decade of secure web gateway leadership. Offered as a scalable SaaS platform through Zscaler's security cloud, it replaces legacy network security solutions, preventing advanced attacks and data loss with a comprehensive zero trust approach. ZIA is integrated into the Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange™ to provide superior defense-in-depth, secure connectivity, end user experience, and administrative visibility and control.