TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Windward Core

    Score9.1 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Windward’s low-code document generation solution embeds into any application, enabling users to populate data-smart documents within the familiar landscape of Microsoft Office. It's a solution from PDFTron since the April 2021 acquisition.

    $190

    per month

    XaitPorter

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AXaitPorter is a co-authoring software solution for teams to collaboratively create, manage and produce documents. With it, users can streamline and optimize document production to maximize revenue from bids and proposals and other business-critical documents. XaitPorter is designed to enable co-authors to focus on creating bid-winning content so that teams can become more efficient while production time and costs are reduced.N/A
    Pricing
    Windward CoreXaitPorter
    Editions & Modules
    Windward Hub Standard
    $19.00
    Per User, Per Month (10 user minimum)*
    Windward Hub Premium
    $49.00
    Per User, Per Month (10 user minimum)*
    Windward Core Pro
    $547.00
    per month*
    Windward Core Flex
    $605.00
    per month*
    Windward Hub Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Windward CoreXaitPorter
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details*Pay annually: 15% discount 10% discount for quarterly payment of Windward Core.—
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Windward CoreXaitPorter
    Small Businesses
    Formstack for Salesforce
    Score7.1 out of 10
    Qwilr
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Formstack for Salesforce
    Score7.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Conga Composer
    Score7.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Windward CoreXaitPorter
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.1
    (25 ratings)
    9.3
    (12 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (16 ratings)
    9.5
    (2 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.9
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    7.5
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Data Sources
    8.5
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Windward CoreXaitPorter
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apryse
    Great for Technical Users. It's great for people a bit more on the technical side. It allows developers to quickly create and modify reporting templates without having to modify source code or make updates to a repository. Potentially Difficult for Non-Technical Users. Making substantial changes to the data portions of reporting can be a bit difficult for non-technical users. While Windward's tools for this are great, it still requires an understanding of the database schema which not all users will have.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Xait
    XaitPorter is ideal when a large document, containing many (preferably independent) sections is being created by more than five writers across different office locations and is subject to review by multiple reviewers and requires formal approval. It is particularly suited for external documents which are to be delivered as a non-editable PDF file.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apryse
    • Native Office output -- not nested tables and/or horrible RTF like other tools generate.
    • Ease of use -- once the data sources are set up, creating tables is as simple as drag and drop (okay, maybe not exactly that simple, but you can certainly create a table of data using drag and drop, then format it and manipulate it as needed).
    • Responsive developers and support -- when I've had questions, they've been addressed VERY quickly and professionally.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Xait
    • This tool gives us the opportunity to work together. We always work in the last revision.
    • We can write comments as we go along and all involved will see it straight away.
    • We can structure it the way we want/our the way customer wants it and print the whole book in one go. We are sure that pictures/text/tables are where they are supposed to be (they have not moved around the document as it does when using Microsoft Word).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apryse
    • It is hard to pick out the tags if they are mixed in with a block of text.
    • Using report variables in select statements causes the selection list of available fields to not show anything.
    • The color themes do not match the office selection and it feels very disconnected.
    Read full review
    Xait
    • It would be helpful to improve functions used to organize and reorganize sections. They work fine, but could be retooled for ease of use. Simple drag-drop over the tree-view from the primary navigator (not only in the dedicated dialog for reordering sections) would be very good. It would be good to support simple flagging or tagging of sections to indicate whatever is meaningful to the user (e.g., to flag a section as imported text that needs formatting, or a section that is high priority for review). The icons do change to indicate predefined workflow states (e.g. approved), but there isn't support for a user-defined tag, perhaps with the ability to filter by tag as many newer applications can do. That would be handy. These aren't criticisms so much as product enhancement suggestions.
    • The editor is ok but could be tuned up a bit. For example, styles in the toolbar dropdown apply only to the whole paragraph. It's hard to indent text. The button tool doesn't consistently remove the button attribute on an existing button; works sometimes, sometimes not. Little stuff. Overall it's adequate for text creation.
    • The process of defining templates and styles appears to be a black art. While it's something you don't do often, it should be simplified and better exposed to ordinary admins.
    • The ability to have more than one section open at a time in the editor would be fantastic. Great productivity tool.
    • Word import/export could be cleaner.
    • The ability to export to html with user-defined style sheets would open new markets for Xait. If the product had that, we'd use Xait to maintain our online help site too.
    • The ability to link to externally stored images rather than lock them inside the Xait library would be huge, as we've expressed to the support team. We manage hundreds of images (diagrams, screen shots etc.) that are used throughout the company, not just for Xait documents. We would like to store them on a file system (e.g. Dropbox) and have them update into Xait automatically when the master copy is modified. This is a very important capability, though in fairness we didn't find it in other products either. Explicit support for Dropbox/Google Drive/Box would be one way, but dynamic linking a la Microsoft Word would be fine, maybe even better.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Apryse
    No answers on this topic
    Xait
    There are too many positive aspects versus negative.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Apryse
    For the most part, the Windward report designer is intuitive for our users; but there are a few areas where it is less intuitive. In these cases, our users need to search Windwards support wiki site, or even contact their support technicians. This can also be due to the short time we've had Windward and our lack of knowledge.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Xait
    We find it to be intuitive to use with a simple menu and right-click based functionality in place.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Apryse
    No answers on this topic
    Xait
    XaitPorter is always there even though we have issues with outages (suddenly the network does not work, but that is internal issue)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Apryse
    No answers on this topic
    Xait
    Our reports/Tenders complete in a reasonable time frame, actually faster than Word. We have not integrated with other systems or softwares.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Apryse
    Support is something they take pride in. Once an issue is raised, they are quick to respond and provide details on a fix. No complaints on support here.
    Read full review
    Xait
    They have a clear method for reporting any issues and work hard to get a resolution, keeping me informed of progress.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Apryse
    No answers on this topic
    Xait
    He was really good. He came from Xait and trained us for several days. He got all involved and answered the questions asked. He was a professional trainee
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Apryse
    No answers on this topic
    Xait
    The online training was really good. They know the way of getting people involved and they answered all questions asked. They were there for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Apryse
    No answers on this topic
    Xait
    I was really satisfied with the implementation
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apryse
    We evaluated several other products to integrate with our new software, but Windward Studios was an obvious standout above the majority. Other applications required some level of software development knowledge and experience to create templates and a much steeper learning curve. After consideration of ease of use, as well as a cost-comparison between different products, Windward Studios was the most suitable product to meet our needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Xait
    The standard product for many years has been Microsoft Word. Some have tried to use SharePoint as a collaborative tool, but it is not suited for the purpose and is generally very user un-friendly. It is not intuitive and we have very few persons with any competency in it. Porter is easy to pick up and the new interface is very intuitive, and the way that Porter works removes many of the typical layout and formatting choices that made Microsoft Word so difficult for the average employee. It also greatly simplifies and reduces the amount of corrective work that tender support staff used to have to do. We are not aware of any product in the market that comes close to Porter. It is an ideal product that was purpose built for collaborative writing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Apryse
    No answers on this topic
    Xait
    I just love the system
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apryse
    • As a fully integrated solution, the ROI is impacted when a client gets stickier with our solution because they see the benefit of Windward.
    • Support has been fantastic for our development team so that as we integrate the solutions we have a clear and clean design.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Xait
    • Too soon to tell. Right now we're still at the near end of the value chain - it still seems expensive given the outputs to date. But we have a lower proposal volume than some companies, so you need to factor that in.
    • Also, the named user licensing is restrictive and problematic in a small company where people perform multiple roles and may dip in and out of the proposal development process over a period of weeks or months. A concurrent user model would be much, much better for us, though I understand you'd need to figure out a way to handle email notifications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Windward Core Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshot

    XaitPorter Screenshots

    Screenshot of XaitPorter - Document WorkspaceScreenshot of XaitPorter - DashboardScreenshot of XaitPorter - Edit PictureScreenshot of XaitPorter - Edit CommentScreenshot of XaitPorter - Export PDF