TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Adobe Experience Manager Reviews & Insights

Score8.6 out of 10

489 Reviews and Ratings

Who Buys & Uses Adobe Experience Manager

Based on 6,297 HG Insights installations.

Powered by

Insights from Adobe Experience Manager Reviewers

Based on 56 verified reviews published in the last 18 months


Synthesised from 56 reviews | Last Published May 27, 2026


Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) serves primarily as a comprehensive content management system and digital asset management platform, enabling organizations to deliver consistent digital experiences across multiple channels. In TrustRadius reviews, users leverage its component-based architecture to reduce development time, and its robust Digital Asset Management (DAM) system, praised by 48% of reviewers, for centralizing and organizing assets for reuse.

Reviewers also report significant gains in operational efficiency and enhanced customer engagement, contributing to faster time to market. However, the platform's high cost of ownership, cited by 21% of reviewers, is a frequent concern, alongside performance issues and complexity for non-technical users. Overall sentiment suggests AEM is a powerful solution, but requires substantial investment and specialized knowledge.


  • Centralized content and digital asset management
  • Multi-site management for brand consistency and localization
  • Reusable Core Components for faster development
  • Seamless integration with other Adobe products and enterprise solutions
  • Improved operational efficiency and productivity
  • High cost of ownership and pricing
  • Performance issues, including slow loading and update times
  • Complexity for non-technical users, requiring specialized developer knowledge
  • Conflicting or outdated documentation
  • User interface could be more intuitive

Adobe Experience Manager Reviews

222 Reviews

Videos

Adobe Experience Manager review

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Adobe Experience Manager Sites as the CMS for our company website and AEM Assets for our digital asset management system.

Pros

  • Sites user interface
  • Assets metadata
  • Sites approvals and publishing

Cons

  • Dynamic media in Sites
  • AI for alt text in Assets
  • AI for searching in Assets

Likelihood to Recommend

Overall, our experience has been good; however, some features that appeared to be easy and out of the box during demos with the Adobe sales team actually don’t work that way unless customized to our experience.

Review of Adobe Experience Manager

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

For my organization, we are using Adobe Experience Manager to drive our support site and a service specific experience with a primary audience of technicians and agents. The products we are using are primarily Sites, Assets and Guides. We are leveraging Guides to publish rich, interactive content for our knowledge, user publications and service manuals. Primary purpose for us is to drive an easy to use, support experience where users can easily find what they are looking for to resolve any issue they may be having with our products or services.

Pros

  • Vertical integrates our CCMS and CMS. Streamlines our publishing pipeline.
  • Provides a platform to enable us to extend and build custom experiences.
  • Cloud integrates well the entire stack and tools to make management straightforward.

Cons

  • More documentation (developer focus).
  • EDS is strategic future but authenticated experience still needs improved support.

Likelihood to Recommend

Tight integration of many products like Analytics, Commerce, etc. is a compelling option for organizations with many different disparate solutions and opportunity to reduce cost and gain functionality by partnering with Adobe.
Vetted Review
Adobe Experience Manager
4 years of experience

Adobe Experience Manager site review

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

In our organization, We use Adobe Experience Manager sites to organize over 500 sites, our Adobe Experience Manager is on prem version.

Pros

  • Content management
  • Page template
  • Component implements

Cons

  • Adobe Support ticket responsive time
  • Support migration
  • Online documentation

Likelihood to Recommend

If asked about Adobe Experience Manager, I think I am likely to tell a colleague that, in my experience, Adobe Experience Manager is a stable for content management system.

Adobe Experience Manager - a feature rich mixed bag

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Adobe Experience Manager to serve all of our public content, from websites to marketing landing pages, to headless data that is surfaced on other platforms.

Pros

  • Stable Platform.
  • Predictable User Experience (authoring, configuration management, workflow).
  • Performant end user interactions. Namely authoring, asset management, as well as client side response times.
  • Highly governed development and deployment process.

Cons

  • Successfully managing the platform requires several different skillsets
  • in traditional AEM, extending the RTE is nearly impossible to do without massive trial and error
  • The application has two personalities: antiquated and outdated, and forward thinking micro service focused. AEM should adopt the microservice architecture entirely OR not at all.

Likelihood to Recommend

Adobe Experience Manager is an excellent choice for enterprise content needs and distribution. Adobe Experience Manager is so large and feature packed that it doesn't make any sense to adopt the platform without the intention of using most if not all of its capabilities.
Vetted Review
Adobe Experience Manager
3 years of experience

Highly recommend Adobe Experience Manager for Businesses

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Our website and DAM run on Adobe Experience Manager.

Pros

  • Easily create landing pages
  • Multi-site manager allows for seamless translation and localization
  • We love the ability to create custom components and templates

Cons

  • Would love the ability to undo when authoring a page

Likelihood to Recommend

Great for companies who are looking to scale their website.
Vetted Review
Adobe Experience Manager
8 years of experience

Adobe Experience Manager Cloud review

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Adobe Experience Manager for our corporate marketing website for the company.

Pros

  • Adobe Experience Manager cloud with CI/CD pipeline is all integrated together
  • With Adobe Experience Manager cloud infrastructure headache is gone
  • Components, templates and codebase have developer control to keep CMS scalable

Cons

  • Migration tools from other CMS
  • Easy and standardize dispatcher configuration setup
  • More easy documentation on MSM

Likelihood to Recommend

Adobe Experience Manager Cloud is well suited for the smaller dev teams with all Adobe Experience Manager features. They take away the infrastructure headaches and all the dev team needs to focus on developing the website.
Vetted Review
Adobe Experience Manager
5 years of experience

Adobe Experience Manager CS - Corporate ready CMS and DAM

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Adobe Experience Manager is our company's CMS system. We are building all of our company portals there, and we are now in the process of migrating our brand portals too. We recently upgraded from the managed services to the cloud services and we are using also the DAM as the central company asset repository.

Pros

  • Web portals update and customization
  • Asset management and sharing

Cons

  • Complexity in building new website components
  • Help in defining a structured asset governance and tag taxonomy

Likelihood to Recommend

Complex online portals suit really well. For simple landing pages, it is a bit overwhelming unless you already have a proper suite of components available. Edge delivery services is now tackling the issue with the landing pages, though. It is really powerful in managing multi country and multi brand portals with proper governance and user permissions.
Vetted Review
Adobe Experience Manager
5 years of experience

Adobe Experience Manager sites

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We have implemented AEM 6 years ago, but we still have simple and structural problems with components and experience fragments. We are trying to understand what went wrong with our infrastructure and development, and may restart from the beginning. We'd like to use Adobe-native components, but right now they aren't available, and we don't know why.

Pros

  • Assets management.
  • Workflow
  • Pages organization.

Cons

  • How to reuse components.
  • Brand guideline.
  • Experience fragments.

Likelihood to Recommend

Reuse of components. We can't use the AEM potential.

Adobe Experience Manager Again and Again.

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I work as a DevOps and Systems Engineer for our AEM servers. The Servers are hosted by AMS.

Pros

  • It has been pretty robust and has handled the growth of sites and the number of sites hosted.
  • AEM is great at separating different levels of storage.
  • I enjoy the user management and permissions schemes.

Cons

  • There are some glitches in permissions inheritance that require us to toggle a save on permissions in groups that inherit from a group that was recently updated.
  • Large packages require stopping the workflow launcher OSGi components or many workflows will slow down the server.
  • Locked pages are hard to find unless I use /siteadmin... I often hear that the CQ tools will go away, but if we lose that, some small things might be harder to do, like finding locked pages.

Likelihood to Recommend

AEM is best suited for Fortune 500 companies. Companies need to architect so they don't use structures that result in thousands of objects in one directory.

When you meet the correct tool

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We build sites, experience fragments and content fragments. Right now we've more than 200 sites on production. We started three years ago and we continue building new experiences for our clients.

Pros

  • Time to market
  • Replace content in a lot places at the same time
  • Easy to use from the beginning

Cons

  • At the eShop with special Content
  • At TV services with custom content
  • More flexible

Likelihood to Recommend

It's maybe the best option for a middle or big company, maybe not the best option for a small project.

Video reviews