Best in Class Construction Management Software - Hands Down
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Pros
- Meeting Minutes: Simple to use and adapt from Agenda to Minutes, attach reference documents efficiently, and assign accountability to attendees.
- Budget/Cost Reporting: There is a learning curve, but the visibility of budgets and costs from inception to closeout is beneficial for the user and makes reporting to investors simple and consistent.
- Document Management: The version history on drawings "sheets" is very helpful when managing a project through design and construction. Issuing addenda, drawings, or tracking down a change in design is simple.
- Pay Applications/Change Order Workflow: the customizable workflows along with time stamps of reviews and response makes tracking down status and bottlenecks very easy.
Cons
- External Users: The ability to have external users review and respond to items or even just distribute items like invoices for example would be beneficial.
- Budget Format: There are so many layers to budgets/contract/etc. When you need to update a budget code, it feels like you need to do it in 3 places in 3 different ways to make it take effect.
- User Management: This has become easier since you don't have to login to a different system anymore but is still a bit cumbersome.
- Program Tracking: The ability to have multiple projects roll-up under a program would be a suggestion.
- Dashboard: The ability to have a dashboard reporting across multiple projects by type/region/program/etc.
Return on Investment
- Consistent processes for a development team to manage a portfolio of projects using different designers and contractors.
- Improved reporting and tracking to investors. We are able to provide our clients a consistent product when it comes to change orders, pay applications, and cost reports. This increases our professionalism and reduces the amount of time wasted in creating/updating excel sheets.


