TrustRadius: an HG Insights company
Barracuda Message Archiver Logo

Barracuda Message Archiver Reviews and Ratings

Rating: 7.3 out of 10
Score
7.3 out of 10

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for Barracuda Message Archiver are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Pros

Reliability: Users appreciate that Barracuda Message Archiver works well and rarely has any issues. Many reviewers have stated that they find the software to be highly reliable, providing them with peace of mind knowing that their important backups are secure.

Robust Search Functionality: The search functionality of Barracuda Message Archiver is praised by users for being robust, fast, and easy to use. Multiple users have mentioned how straightforward it is to search and recover emails without much effort, making it a valuable feature.

User-Friendly Interface: Users find the user interface of Barracuda Message Archiver easy to navigate, with most basic operations being intuitive and easy to set up. Several reviewers have highlighted the software's user-friendly nature, making it quick and effortless to retrieve any emails needed.

Reviews

2 Reviews

Archiving the easy way

Rating: 8 out of 10

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We archive all mails to be able to keep mailboxes small (max 1 year of email online) and to avoid deletions of all emails due to bad intent, accident or virusses.

Pros

  • easy implementation
  • retention policies in the archive
  • integration on the client.

Cons

  • the folder structure of the mailbox is harder to keep up with
  • it is a bit confusing when you search for non email items, like contacts.

Likelihood to Recommend

This is the perfect solution for a quick implementation of archivation. You configure it once and it keeps on going. Users do not need to interact to archive, only to find things back.

Barracuda Message Archivers in Warema

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

It is used all over the whole organization. We tried to solve many problems with it. The first problem was to reduce mailbox size in Outlook, which we managed with the outlook add-in and stubbing. Second thing was reducing power on the mail servers. We did this by reducing the database sizes after implementing Barracuda. Last and most important thing is that we can store easily our mails for 10 years and more, what the government wants from us.

Pros

  • Archiving with journaling.
  • Search with WebClient.
  • Search with Add-In.
  • Stubbing.

Cons

  • In Archiving there should be a "Header only" download for users with offline stores.
  • Single sign-on in WebClient.
  • Single sign-on in Outlook Add-In.
  • More performance to the boxes.

Likelihood to Recommend

For every company which is too big for MailStore. MailStore is much cheaper and easier...so mostly enough for 5 to 20 people companies. But for all bigger companies with 200 plus users it is the right solution. Please be sure, that it is not easy to get it running. But when it runs, it is mostly stable.