Cvent Abstract Management Works
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use Abstract Management to collect potential presentations for our Symposium each year. We also use it to collect award nominations for our Innovation of the Year award which we also award at our Symposium. We like that you can send out the link provided and anyone can submit. We set up our judges/reviewers and it is easy to include instructions on the portal so they know how to judge. This year we are utilizing the ability for the reviewers to receive emails as submissions are received so that they can review as they come in instead of reviewing all of them at the same time closer to the deadline. It is super efficient in sending out acceptance and rejection emails. We also like that Abstract Management works together with Events and we can pull in the sessions into those events straight from Abstract Management.
Pros
- Email notifications to reviewers and submitters
- Easy to use for submitters
- Provides a way to loop accepted presentations into the events
Cons
- Marketing weblinks could be added so that we can pull reports of which links were used to drive submissions
- Runner-up emails. Something between reject and accept. For our Innovation of the Year award, we reject everyone who did not get the top 3, send out the accept email to the winner, but just leave the 2nd and 3rd place in the submitted mode because there is not an in-between.
Likelihood to Recommend
Cvent Abstract Management is best for accepting potential presentations for events and accepting award nominations. It is great when you have sessions that need to be judged and/or graded.
