DeepSource

Time-saving feature: Many reviewers have found DeepSource's Autofix and code quality checks to be helpful in saving time. The engineering team at Spiti appreciated the ability to rely on an automated tool to fix issues and commit changes without human intervention, while developers from InsurTechnix noted that DeepSource's highly detailed automated analysis was an excellent complement to high-level peer review of source code PRs. Additionally, Edyst team found that DeepSource led to more productive conversations around their code and better pull requests.

Ease-of-use: A significant number of users praised the platform for being easy to set up and use with a friendly web GUI, simple integration with GitHub, and BitBucket repositories. Also, one reviewer pointed out that it is free of cost which is helpful for students.

Test coverage monitoring: Several reviewers appreciated DeepSource's ability to monitor test coverage on new code changes. Spiti's developers wouldn't merge code until all uncovered lines reported by DeepSource were tested, helping them catch potential issues early on.

Alert Overload: Some users have reported that the DeepSource bot throws too many alerts, even for small changes. This has caused frustration and can lead to important issues being overlooked.

Manual Fixing Preferable: A few users find setting up some features of DeepSource like autofixes to be intrusive and prefer fixing problems manually because they feel that they understand the code much better than DeepSource.

Pricing Concerns: While there is value in using DeepSource, some users are concerned about its pricing structure. They believe it could do with a rework as it is not affordable for all.