TrustRadius: an HG Insights company
Back to Overview

EYardstick Reviews and Ratings

Rating: 9.8 out of 10
Score
9.8 out of 10

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for EYardstick are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Pros

Comprehensive Assessment: Users appreciated the variety of question types offered by the product, allowing for a comprehensive assessment of candidates' skills in various areas. Some reviewers mentioned that it covered all topics related to DevOps and software testing, indicating a broad range of knowledge areas within these fields.

Reliable Evaluation: Reviewers commended the quality of the content used for hiring assessments, suggesting that the product provided reliable and relevant material for evaluating candidates' abilities. Additionally, users found Eyardstick's methodology of ensuring validity and reliability of tests to be commendable, indicating a well-designed and accurate assessment process.

Flexibility in Designing Assessments: The ability to create customized tests based on specific requirements was praised by users as helpful for conducting assessments tailored to different job roles. This suggests that the product offered flexibility and adaptability in designing assessments for multiple positions.

Reviews

5 Reviews

Best Talent Assessment Software

Rating: 10 out of 10

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Most of my team works from home or remotely. It was impossible to conduct an online pre-interview test and ensure the authenticity of the candidate. That is when I came across EYardstick and their proctoring solution is robust. I am very impressed with the accuracy in reporting, the deviations eventually brought integrity to virtual assessments.

Pros

  • Variety of question types, quality of the content used for hiring assessments.
  • Eyardstick's methodology of ensuring validity and reliability of the test is commendable.
  • Coding and database simulators. Video interviews.

Cons

  • Can conduct practical coding tests for Development, Front End, Database and Data Science roles but hackathons are not available.
  • Our candidates are using mobile responsive application for taking tests in Mobile. Good to give dedicated mobile applications.

Likelihood to Recommend

EYardstick is a neat tool. It's not complicated to use and if your requirement is to do a pre-employment assessment for a wide variety of roles with minimal support then this is the right one for your team.

SJ
Shailaja Jayanthy
IT Operations Manager in Information Technology at MphasiS an HP Company (10,001+ employees)
Vetted Review
EYardstick
3 years of experience
View profile

Great experience in hiring best employees

Rating: 10 out of 10

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We incorporated EYardstick in our hiring process and find it very easy to use and informative. We are able to track applicants' progress and plan accordingly for the next step of our hiring process based on the accuracy of the information that report analysis provides. Test batteries were quite relevant for the roles we had so it saved our time in creating another test. Overall, since we have started using Eyardstick, hiring has become quite simple and yet accurate.

Pros

  • It's very easy to learn and use.
  • Very helpful with selecting the right individual for the position needed.
  • Ready-to-use test saves lots of time.

Cons

  • Mobile application is missing. but not a big issue.
  • Analytics could be more advanced.

Likelihood to Recommend

After using EYardstick, we have been able to ensure the candidates I hire are of a high enough calibre to perform at or above expectations.

MD
MADHURIMA DUTTA
Senior DevOps And AWS Engineer in Engineering at HP (10,001+ employees)
Vetted Review
EYardstick
3 years of experience
View profile

Excellent Talent Benchmarking and Pre-Employment assessment tool

Rating: 10 out of 10

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

On average we interview 500+ candidates on a monthly basis, we had a technical team dedicated for doing these initial level interviews. But after the tool is introduced, most of the team is now working on fixes and support and also the conversions improved up to 90%. So now we only talk to "Potential" Candidates who clear the tests with the set benchmark.

Pros

  • The ability to create almost any kind of assessment for different job roles in just a few minutes is the product's greatest advantage.
  • Online Java Coding tests, Devops tests and Online Full Stack developer tests meticulously cover all the competencies that need to be measured which constitutes majority of our hiring.

Cons

  • Wish to have AI-based shortlisting feature.
  • Analytics can be more advanced.
  • Though tool has a lot of reports but to derive the value out of it is time consuming. Hope they improve in this aspect.

Likelihood to Recommend

Using EYardstick as a pre-employment assessment tool will reduce a lot of overhead in talking to so many candidates who are not even close to the opening you have.

SR
Stephen Riner
Staff Engineer in Information Technology at Juniper (10,001+ employees)
Vetted Review
EYardstick
3 years of experience

Best assessment tool for identifying QA Engineers

Rating: 10 out of 10

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Introduction of pre-employment assessments as a precursor before actual interviews is surprisingly making us talk to almost perfect fits. There are two things we observed, one is the knowledge and skill of the candidate and also his seriousness as he is spending around 90 minutes for a test.

Pros

  • Coding simulators with pre-built questions for many roles.
  • Wide variety of topics in software testing space.
  • Availability of questions on niche topics like BDD, Cucumber, etc.

Cons

  • Reporting and analytics module can include more detailed reports.
  • UI should be customisable to meet the company's branding colors.
  • Some of the topics can have more questions in their database.

Likelihood to Recommend

After using EYardstick, we have been able to ensure the candidates I hire are of the caliber needed for my job. A recent predictive validity of the test conducted in our team gave great results matching the test predictions.

SK
Sai Krishna
Sr Software Test Engineer in Information Technology at IBM India Pvt Ltd (10,001+ employees)
Vetted Review
EYardstick
3 years of experience
View profile

EY Review

Rating: 10 out of 10

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

EYardstick is used by me and my peer teams to assess candidates before they are scheduled for an Interview. It saves our time in talking to candidates based on resume. Now we talk to candidates based on assessment report.

Pros

  • Online assessments.
  • Reporting.
  • Coding simulators.
  • Query simulators.
  • Good question data base.

Cons

  • No AIML elements yet, I would like to see it very soon from EYardstick.

Likelihood to Recommend

We first chose EYardstick because it was more effective and more user friendly than our previous assessment software. As the years passed, the customisable features and accurate assessment results made it work for any job role which is why we have continued using this assessment tool. One good thing is there are feature updates regularly to meet our growing demands.

CB
Chandra Babu
Operations Delivery Manager in Information Technology at Cognizant Technology Solutions (10,001+ employees)
Vetted Review
EYardstick
2 years of experience
View profile