IBM Security QRadar is security information and event management (SIEM) Software.
The following is a quick overview of editions offered by other software in similar categories
wide app store that helps integrate hundreds of vendors and adds a lot of value to the incident response process. An interesting example is the use case … regardless of the origin of the logs. This becomes an advantage as the price is agreed between the parties before purchase, so you have knowledge of what … more complex for paying for the solution,…
Enrich incident events High cost with virtual machines Reducing time for detect threats
It is expensive the leaders are always trying to replace with a cheaper solution Although the solution is very good
Ensured regulatory requirements for saving different system logs Very expensive QRadar technical support
Improved visibility into the organization's security posture. Long-term cost savings by preventing security breaches.
Quality of Investigation & Efficiency to use Reduced risk and cost of a major security breach. Analyst time spent investigating incidents has
SIEM provides a detection and correlation capability that provides a lot of value according to the detections that are escalated with clients. This has helped
on threats, the raw decreases because the tools that I need are really expensive because the product doesn't have it. So if I need artificial intelligence
It is not suited for startups and small scale enterprises because of its cost.
analyze centralized log very quickly. It is comes with relatively medium in cost as compare to other SIEM tools.
price, to be honest IBM Security QRadar SIEM package is very good for most customers
enrichment like User Behaviour Analytics Top quality alerts gives enormous value to the "passive" data that flows into the infrastructure … the best from its competitors. Reliable and stable but sometimes very expensive, the SIEM from IBM offers a wide range of scenarios in…
company. Quality alert if finely tuned for a 24x7 SOC Still lack on hardware cost
IBM Qradar is cheaper and also easy to use. For splunk you need dedicated team of experts.
example; For Windows OS, there are agents, agents and wef methods.Default values are defined for log resources such as Exchange and IIS.
Source Management, New Offense page, Use case manager... QRadar is good at price-performance.
meets our expectations. Maybe we can add a new solution for SMEs because of price.
Cost and integrations played a crucial part in product finalization. QRadar was
saved men power more accurate and efficient more cost effective
Calculation is also not present. Currently, the average value is taking. Customers are asking for an accurate value on EPS.
Lower cost for maintaining and managing security. Maximum endpoint visibility. Access
Automates threat detection and remediation. Has clean UI. Cost effective. Offers comprehensive tutorials.
logs that can be ingested in Qradar Can produce a lot of false positives Pricing structure should be cheeper and enhancement could be faster
More responsive support Harmonised prices throughout different worldwide markets Tidy up UI and make it more intuitive … security budget, though the QRadar Community Edition could provide a more cost-effective solution. It's also well-suited to organisations with a
User experience Providing more insights on threats Reduced pricing … QRadar is one of the most robust tools and hardly suffers from any glitches Pricing is decent if we consider overall functionalities and its well-engineered
