IBM Storage FlashSystem

“Tier I [is] used for high read and write operations on disks, Cost is very high and Tier 3 used for application servers, read and write operations are less and cost also less.”

“Before Flash storage was so much more expensive, not feasible for small shops, now a better value than a spinning disk or SSD.”

“For our FS5200 use case we received ROI in 6-months, exceeding expectations by 3-months For our FS7300 use case we received ROI in 4-months, exceeding expectations by 7-months For our FS9500 use case...”

“The proactive support and faster response times that come with the premium tier are well worth the investment in such a mission-critical part of our infrastructure. … It’s a good example of why we value having premium support in place.”

“It is not suitable for smaller organizations as the cost of implementation is quite high and the Return on Investment won't be high.”

“It has protected our data against cyber attacks and disasters Saved time via automation and high uptime It has reduced our infrastructure cost with predictable pricing via storage assurance. … It gives your business a powerful, cost-saving edge in your data center.”

“IBM Storage FlashSystem has reduced our infrastructure cost with predictable pricing via storage assurance It has protected our data against cyber attacks and disasters Saved time via automation and... … It gives your business a powerful, cost-saving edge in your data center.”

“The operational cost has been reduced particularly the maintenance cost.”

“
We can integrate it with AI for High speed data access which can be very helpful during recovery.
Even though the Initial cost is relatively higher the opiating cost reduces drastically over...”

“Pricing, but it's also very low in price.”

“The cost of IBM Storage FlashSystem may be a bit higher than your typical storage systems, but the performance makes up for the cost, 100%.”