TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Koofr

Score9 out of 10

7 Reviews and Ratings

What is Koofr?

Koofr, from the Slovenian company of the same name, is presented as a safe and simple way to store, backup and share documents, music, photos, and videos, so users can access data anytime and anywhere.

Categories & Use Cases

Top Performing Features

  • Access control

    Users can control access to (shared) files, including different levels of access such as view-only or permission to edit.

    Category average: 8.3

  • File search

    A search function that allows users to easily find files, and in some cases even search within multiple files.

    Category average: 7.8

  • User and role management

    Administrators can manage users and user groups by role, in terms of setting permissions for things like file access, sharing, and editing permissions.

    Category average: 8.4

Areas for Improvement

  • Audio files

    Supports audio file types, such as .mp3, .mp4, and .wav

    Category average: 8.1

  • Document collaboration

    Users can edit files and attach comments to files.

    Category average: 8

  • Device sync

    Device syncing that updates files connected to the cloud, keeping all files up to date regardless of where they are edited or viewed.

    Category average: 8.5

Good online storage easy file-drop landing page

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I use Koofr for data storage backups in the secure vault, but primarily I use the file drop landing page for clients to securely send various files to my business rather than sending me documents, or other files with sensitive data, via email. Given the link is unchanging, all I need to do is send a single link for all clients to upload the files they're sending me.

Pros

  • File drop landing page
  • Secure vault storage
  • General cloud-based storage

Cons

  • The file-drop landing page only shows a banner saying the files that have been uploaded are complete. There's no subsequent pop-up or something to confirm if the person uploads additional files, making it confusing to know if the files have been uploaded

Return on Investment

  • Improved time efficiency by not needing to follow up clients for files

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Google Drive

Other Software Used

Google Drive

Koofr basically serves to create a network of interconnected clouds

Pros

  • When using Koofr we generally evaluate the analytics of each cloud we decide to work with to store data, and based on this, we can choose whether to use it or not depending on its level of security and information encryption - since we want to access the data easily, but without having problems with intrusions.
  • The platform allows us to make comparisons between the quality of one service and another so that we can know which clouds are the most convenient to work with, and depending on the results, these are interconnected to our other clouds in a short time.
  • The scope achieved through Koofr is very extensive: we can schedule backups in the cloud well in advance, so it is completely unnecessary to carry out such copies without the need to run the operations manually.
  • In terms of adaptability capabilities to office software, Koofr is perhaps the best structured service to store in the cloud the documentation work that is managed through platforms such as Microsoft Word, which requires higher levels of complexity in terms of document configuration.
  • The plans that Koofr offers can be configured depending directly on the level of space required, so prices vary in relation to the amount of information that needs to be sent to the cloud, leaving aside the fixed monthly payments for a predetermined amount of space.

Cons

  • The connection and saving capacity that we will have from Koofr depends directly on the type of plan we choose to work with, and this can make it quite difficult to upload a certain amount of large or heavy formats to several clouds at once.
  • Koofr's platform is not sufficiently adaptable to streaming services generally, and this makes it difficult to work with cloud copies of the streaming presentations we make on platforms like Twitch or YouTube, which limits our ability to view them in the future.
  • If you work with many devices, the Koofr platform usually presents problems to synchronize them all, and displays the information in the cloud depending on the connection speed of each device involved, which causes that some do not have the same accessibility to the information as others.

Return on Investment

  • There have been no drawbacks when calculating the company's overall ROI. Because we have generally expanded our storage capacity with Koofr, we have been able to work better.
  • The gains with Koofr have been varied, as they depend directly on the amount of work to be stored in the cloud, which seasonally turns out to be small.

Other Software Used

Mailchimp, Sendinblue, Robly