TrustRadius Insights for Lytho Workflow are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.
Business Problems Solved
Users of inMotion Ignite have had a wonderful experience using the platform for project management and collaboration. They have found that onboarding, training, and deployment are seamless, giving them confidence in their choice of platform. The support and customer success teams have been highly responsive and helpful, addressing inquiries promptly. New features have been added since deployment, enhancing the overall functionality of the platform.
inMotion Ignite is relied upon by companies to efficiently manage client projects and enable real-time collaboration with clients. It has significantly improved project tracking, creative briefs, and review processes, leading to enhanced communication and work quality for marketing teams. Users appreciate the organization provided by inMotion, with all information having a designated place. Additionally, the software helps improve efficiency and responsiveness to clients. The implementation process has been positive, with patient and helpful support in migrating users and projects.
The software offers a user-friendly experience with excellent customer support and integration with third-party software. It simplifies the submission and scheduling of requests, revolutionizing the creative review process. Furthermore, it is cost-effective and fits within budget constraints while offering top-notch customer support and receptiveness to user suggestions.
Overall, inMotion Ignite is a valuable tool for creative and marketing teams in fast-moving companies. It supports various content types across different business units, automating project steps and speeding up time to market. While there are areas that could be improved, such as intern seat pricing or streamlining the home screen for more iPad-friendliness, users find that inMotion Ignite greatly enhances their productivity and collaboration efforts.
I use Lytho Workflow to proof ads with stakeholders and track my workload. On average, about 20 people at my company have to approve an ad before it can go live. Lytho Workflow makes it easy to see who has looked at the proof, what they would like changed and how many revisions it has gone through. We also lack a project manager, so the software enables me to track how many hours of work I've accepted each week, when jobs are due and what's required for each job.
Pros
Requests - Request forms are set up so that certain fields are required and there's a minimum turnaround time. This prevents others from submitting an incomplete request or requesting things last minute.
Proofing - Chasing after people to approve a proof is always a pain, but the simplicity of Lytho Workflow makes it less of a pain. I can quickly remind people in the route to review the proof by clicking a button.
Templates - I use templates so that a list of tasks is created for me when I accept a job. It also creates a timeline for when each task needs to be done.
Cons
Crashes - The workflow web page crashes very frequently and I've never been able to figure out what the cause is. Refreshing the page always fixes this issue.
Proof Approvals - I wish there was a way to remove all people from the route that have approved and resend to those who haven't. Reviewers who have already approved often do not want to see future proof revisions coming through their inbox. It would be nice to have this as an option, rather than having to create a new revision and manually removing all that have approved before sending.
A more personalized dashboard - My dashboard is more geared towards someone who is requesting or reviewing jobs, rather than someone who is completing them. As a result, I rarely use this page.
Likelihood to Recommend
I don't have much to compare Lytho Workflow workflow to, but I'd say it gets the job done for my small department. I can't imagine a world where we didn't have it. There are times when the software does not work as expected though. For example, if one of the marketing managers archives a request after it has been accepted, it will disappear from the request queue but remain as a job in my job queue. From there, I have to archive it again. The same goes for comments - if someone makes a comment on the request, it does not appear on the job, nor am I notified. I have to click through to the request, from the job to see those comments.
Our marketing department uses Lytho for request intakes, project management, creative workflow, and online proofing. It keeps everything contained in one central location. It streamlines our creative process and job tracking. No more emails get lost in the shuffles. We use it to prioritize our work. We can assign multiple users to the same project. We love the real-time collaboration and all the specific annotation tools for marking up proofs.
Pros
Workflow management
Real-time collaboration
Easy-to-use interface
Cons
Not being able to permanently delete inactive/old users (i.e. employees that are no longer with the company).
Search filtering features are lacking.
Not being notified when someone replies to my comment without @ mentioning me.
Likelihood to Recommend
Lytho has been a great solution for our enterprise organization. It would work well for a business of any size. It is very user-friendly; anyone can use it without training. It's constantly improving and adding more features. The customer support is very helpful and responsive. It's browser-based so there is no software required to install.
Our entire campus uses inMotion in some capacity. Most of the campus uses it to request projects from our department and review proofs online. It allows us to manage client requests, projects/tasks, and reviewer feedback on proofs. Our department uses it to manage everything from web graphics to course catalogs. It's incredibly helpful to be able to track everything in real time.
Pros
Project requests - can be tailored to fit your exact needs
Project management - can assign tasks, track time, etc.
Proofing - robust proofing environment that's easy for clients to learn
Cons
Some areas are rather clunky and repetitive when it comes to project management, like editing a template once applied.
Once a review is live, it's very difficult to edit the reviewers unless a current tier is active.
Pretty expensive compared to the competition.
Likelihood to Recommend
It's a flexible program that can be molded to fit most businesses. It's geared towards agencies but we've been able to use it successfully as an in-house solution. It's pretty intuitive for the most part and is easy for new hires or clients to get up and running pretty quickly.