Related Quote from Verified User
compatibility, a low footprint, and reasonably high performance. If you have cost constraints, or limited server resources, I recommend MariaDB, particularly
We're sorry, but no detailed pricing edition information is available. For the latest information on pricing, visit the official pricing page.
Other pricing plans from leading alternatives in this category.
| Feature | Free Version | Paid Version |
|---|---|---|
| Forum/Community | Available | Available |
| FAQ/Knowledgebase | Available | Available |
| Unavailable | Available |
compatibility, a low footprint, and reasonably high performance. If you have cost constraints, or limited server resources, I recommend MariaDB, particularly
Price Distributed systems Few resources asked … than SQL server. We went with MariaDB Platform even because it is free of charge, with better performances.
High cost horizontal scale Kafka compatibility JSON management
with the maintenance problems. On the other hand, this service is a bit expensive.
Cost effective Maxscale is especially useful Encryption … MariaDB gives a low-cost option for DB engines
Initial setup needs to be improved (determining correct configuration values). If replication fails, needs to be easier to recover. More functionality
As a positive impact, indicate that its cost and support is much lower than other databases. … versatile and highly available solution that did not have an exorbitant cost. We do not have a huge amount of data or an excessive load for this…
speed or flexibility then there are other database models (document, key-value store, etc.) that may be a better fit. … headroom and value per-server. … We were already wanting to migrate away from Cassandra for reasons of stability, cost (more servers
some limitations (if you are used to Oracle) it has been much easier and cheaper (in several ways) to operate and has more than met my company's needs.
costs of many other DB solutions. It delivers great performance at a great price with flexible engines that allow tuning based on the needs of your data and … winner compared to any other database I've used. Reliable, scale-able, affordable--you name the consideration and…
MariaDB is cheaper than Oracle Database and MSSQL server. MySQL owned by Oracle. So MariaDB
who are familiar with MySQL, MariaDB is easy to administer and configure. Cost - MariaDB is free to use. … prefer to work with other database solutions that have more restrictive/expensive licensing. ……
without having to have to worry about complex DBA stuff or dealing with expensive licences. Lot's of out online infrastructure uses MariaDB and most anything … MariaDB has saved us tens of thousands of dollars in licensing fees. The ROI is instant. A product like maria makes…
Helping to integrate to solve deadlock issues. Reduces the business cost as it provides facility to handle a large amount of data on one server. It

Low cost No licenses Quick to implement (under an hour)
impact. We're in the process of moving away from Oracle and their cost per CPU pricing model.
still missing - and really, just the one - an ability to compute median values from the data. I miss it in my work quite often. … standard SQL features in its query language; and Amazon's products were too expensive for our use.