Related Quote from Verified User
organizations that are on a tight budget as deploying Red Hat OpenShift can be expensive.
For the latest information on pricing, visit https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/cloud-computing/openshift/pricing
organizations that are on a tight budget as deploying Red Hat OpenShift can be expensive.
solution that they offer. But as far as the features, functionality, and cost of ownership, OpenShift outshines those others that we've looked at. So it
capabilities. Training employees again slow down development/increase costs. Expensive as compared to other cloud based platforms like Kubernetes
market-changing trends. OpenShift helps to application development time, time to value, and market with safer applications, stabler, and more secure. At the same … Speed to value and speed to market - very positive. Developer, Operator/Administrator, Security
Vendor lock-in. Maintenance cost. Short ttl of the releases. … or where the license cost elevated is not sustainable. … Negative: The ROI of OpenShift is difficult to reach because of the high cost of license and support
that is well received and furthermore customizable Provides access to rich value adding network of partners and open source technologies.
Integration with Non-Red Hat Technologies Cost Considerations Resource Consumption
infrastructure and public cloud platforms, depending on resource needs and cost considerations. … boost in customer satisfaction as of now, and we are hoping to gain much more cost savings in the long run.
too long, so decrease the installation time. Reduce the price so that smaller businesses can afford it. … stored on the cloud, it can also store enormous volumes of data, though the price also increases with it as the amount of data increases.
Support Developer experience (installation, logs, debugging). Cost
the way to go, coupled with the support of Red Hat which adds a lot of value. If you want more control over your platform, and more customization, OpenShift
The increased complexity requires hiring new capable staff that becomes expensive for the company to retain.
industry best practices Disaster recovery. Active-active scenario is too expensive
Cost less to operate in large scale deployments
Switching to ROSA was a massive decrease in cost - positive.
Openness is much better in Openshift as compared to Tanzu It is cheaper as compared. Support is a must faster Telco trend is more towards Openshift
agility and reduce time to market, improve the performance and reduce overall cost of ownership
Fasten time to value for customers.
Expensive Doesn't necessarily scales to mid-market-sized customers. … public cloud, and private cloud scenarios. However, it can be a little expensive and too complex for smaller less complex customers/deployments.
Somewhat okay. ROI had been expensive. Using over a period may reduce the cost. … Licensing. IBM Partnership. Expensive with Legacy Licensing. 9
Ansible to schedule the startup and shutdown of clusters which helps with the cost optimization for the workloads that are running. We also use Ansible for
Increases operational efficiency Decreases cost prices Leads to better organization of platforms. … Time Efficiency Cost efficient Project delivery
we were able to focus more on code. ROI was high, as we were able to save cost on hosting. ROI was high, as It was easily adopted by our existing resources
Cost is somewhat on the higher side Documentation needs a lot of improvement and
purchase of the professional service from RedHat, which will lead to bigger cost concerns. The auto-scaling setting is not perfect. It can not apply ad-hoc