SingleStoreFormerly MemSQLPricing

Optimized performance Cost saving Faster response time

Traditional Warehouse Systems like Teradata, Netezza, Greenplum Adds lot of value to the business like couple of operations which never worked in traditional

take way to long to get responses when something critical is breaking. Pricing can at times be a bit unclear. Pipelines are great but can be a bit of a

speed uptime cost … Reliability, cost, speed

the db so no makes up for the price in a way We are able to provide better analytics to our customers - providing more value

use. Not having to spend so much time modeling the data to get it ready. Cost.

mixture of data computed dynamically at the time of display and pre-computed values generated when data is ingested. Our software allows users to track the … at Microsoft Azure SQL, MariaDB, Vertica, and RedShift. Our criteria were cost and performance. We also needed compatibility with the Azure cloud as this … perfo…

a separate async analytical database. However, running SingleStore is expensive, it requires a powerful cluster with a lot of RAM. If you don't need to

While improving, backup is still hard to configure Pricing of self-hosted instances Few external documentation resources

application. We are also working on another project to reduce the data storage cost and improve the performance for an IOT company.

outperformed these in speed and performance. However it is more expensive but has been worth the cost so far.

than it helped and had a lot of overhead and cost. We then looked at Algolia which seemed rather expensive to add on top of our current db expenses but … SSO integration was initially challenging - they are already improving this Cost - each tier literally doubles in price. It would be nice if there was some … 16x faster on requests 200…

Lower price plans for their paid solution A longer period of time to use the free credits … experience, than a proprietary language as competitors have) Less up-front cost/spend as a startup, not needing to spend on additional things

Cost effective when compared top other big data solutions (like DynamoDB) … FLOWD started with SingleStore at its core. SingleStore has been providing a cost effective and fast solution for for FLOWD's core data lake.

Query cost is bit higher.

analytical queries, I'd recommend looking else where for a simpler and cheaper database service.

be challenging, particularly for small to medium-sized enterprises. The pricing model, especially when scaling out to accommodate larger data volumes or … or higher transaction rates, can become significant. More flexible pricing options or clearer guidelines on managing and optimizing resources to control … Projects - Not the best fit for project…

Improve customer experience Reduce cost … Very similar offerings. SingleStore promise a faster query speed and better cost structure. Vector databases is anoter offering that is unique to SingleStore

Managed Service Pricing Larger User base … Suited well for application databases. Not best fit for key-value storages.

faster :) However, if you database is relatively small (under 1GB) then the value that SingleStore provides may not be there for you. Yes, even 1GB can take

Currently the costing happens at the configuration level - S2, S4 etc and is hence not fully elastic

Especially in the cloud space, the lesser we use the resources, the more cost-effective SingleStore is perfect for running data analytics workloads due

and with more confidence.It has also allowed us to decrease infrastructure cost. … is if their base managed cluster is too expensive and I don't want to managed it myself … 35% infrastructure cost Huge decrease is data management complexity

perform data quality checks with our ML algorithms. By doing this we saved the cost of maintaining different database systems for our products data and the user

Especially in the cloud space, the lesser we use the resources, the more cost-effective it is.