SingleStoreFormerly MemSQLPricing

Managed Service Pricing Larger User base … Suited well for application databases. Not best fit for key-value storages.

and a separate async analytical database.However running SingleStore is expensive, it requires a powerful cluster with a lot of RAM. If don't need to process

mixture of data computed dynamically at the time of display and pre-computed values generated when data is ingested. Our software allows users to track the … at Microsoft Azure SQL, MariaDB, Vertica, and RedShift. Our criteria were cost and performance. We also needed compatibility with the Azure cloud…

faster :) However, if you database is relatively small (under 1GB) then the value that SingleStore provides may not be there for you. Yes, even 1GB can take

Currently the costing happens at the configuration level - S2, S4 etc and is hence not fully elastic

Especially in the cloud space, the lesser we use the resources, the more cost-effective SingleStore is perfect for running data analytics workloads due

and with more confidence.It has also allowed us to decrease infrastructure cost. … is if their base managed cluster is too expensive and I don't want to managed it myself … 35% infrastructure cost Huge decrease is data management complexity

perform data quality checks with our ML algorithms. By doing this we saved the cost of maintaining different database systems for our products data and the user

Especially in the cloud space, the lesser we use the resources, the more cost-effective it is.

Results driven product Cost effective satisfaction of the decision-makers lower operational complexity … Price Product Features Prior Experience with the Product

Cost effective Results driven product

I am not certain about the price comparison of SingleStore to other vendors, but definitely, I would recommend

cases. It can scale significantly, although its in-memory usage does mean the cost of scaling to data size is higher, so I believe for very large data sets … Warehouse, PowerBI, Aerospike, etc. From what I've seen MemSQL is well worth the cost when latency and data freshness needs are high, i.e. you need a lot of queries … with very fresh streaming fact and dimensional dat…

is that when there's a need to support more than a few TBs the price is very expensive and therefore it will be harder to use for applications in production … with number of nodes (sometimes extra nodes hurt the performance). Very expensive compared to other databases.

usage would be good. The price was the one that kept us away from purchasing for the first few years. Now we are able to afford due to a promotion that … applications use the real time analytics features. Together they have reduced the cost of our development significantly…

The availability of high-performance, simple and affordable database technology like SingleStore’s provides an additional accelerator

As a consultant and value-added reseller we position SingleStore at our enterprise customers as a hybrid database solution that can process both operational

having a Child Aggregator becomes optional since not all the customers can afford an external balancing solution and does not feel confortable with switching … However you still have to provision big clusters, which sometimes it's more expensive than having traditional technologies…

scaling. The database is going to use a lot of resources so if the scenario is cost sensitive then perhaps is not the best solution in terms of infrastructure

data scales up, the cost of maintaining a big cluster with memory keep increasing (both the infrastructure cost and licensing cost) becomes high. Also the … build small to medium sized (near) real-time analytical systems with. The cost and inflexible licensing model limits large scaled use. Technically the best … make it a 24-7 reliable database system there is…

Scaling - columnar storage makes it easy to scale without cost or signifigant performance hits Speed - where performance is an issue, we

License cost is lower than many of its competitors. Requires very little administration … solution architecture, which means less infrastructure is needed, less license cost, and shorter development cycle.

writesAerospike great K-V that is great with writes and reads. But expensive. More expensive than SingleStore DB (formerly MemSQL). FireBird opensource, but … SingleStore DB (formerly MemSQL) and VoltDb, I would choose VoltDB, based on pricing.