Adobe is Better
July 13, 2022

Adobe is Better

Moises Abraham Lacayo Cortes | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Adobe Stock

In my organization it is used to extract images, videos, and illustrations, and use them in different marketing and advertising campaigns, the problems it addresses are the lack of creativity to create advertising campaigns, lack of budget to access photographs, their scope of use as we have already mentioned is to generate advertising and marketing campaigns.
  • variety of images
  • video quality
  • Excellent 3D resources
  • more comfortable prices
  • add videos in the subscription of 29 euros
  • more sources
  • accessibility
  • user friendly
  • it is very diverse
  • Greater customer attraction
  • More movements in social networks
  • higher customer retention rate
both Adobe Stock and shutter stock fulfill the same function, I believe that both can satisfy their customers, however, the position that adobe has against shutter stock is immense, making there more confidence in adobe, in prices and what it offers each one according to the subscription plans is very similar, in conclusion, Adobe Stock is better for the simple fact of being Adobe.

Do you think Adobe Stock delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Adobe Stock's feature set?


Did Adobe Stock live up to sales and marketing promises?


Did implementation of Adobe Stock go as expected?


Would you buy Adobe Stock again?


It is very suitable in scenarios in which any type of company needs to generate an advertising and marketing campaign that attracts more customers, it is also quite suitable in scenarios in which a company that is just beginning to operate can use images, videos, illustrations, etc. to advertise in a more economical way, in a less suitable scenario we have advertising companies that use Adobe Stock deceiving their customers with high prices