A Powerful Platform for Connected Planning and Agile Decision-Making
Overall Satisfaction with Anaplan
We are implementing Anaplan to our customers. Most of the customers usually still rely on excels to do their planning, which there are a lot of silos due to the limitation of excels and computing power of local machine. Anaplan is an excellent platform to help company to streamline planning process in a specific function (e.g. Finance, Supply Chain, HR) by removing silos and providing real-time calculations. Also it enables organization to achieve connected planning in an organization by linking models in different function together on the same platform.
Pros
- Financial Planning & Analysis
- Flexible architecture in Anaplan enables users to plan at a higher granularity
- Supply Chain Planning
- Time dimensions allows statistical forecasting can be easily implemented
- Staff Cost Planning
- No rigid structure in the platform allows organization to define the planning hierarchy that fit the organization perfectly
Cons
- Reporting capability
- Would be great if there is an option to include properties of dimension into report
- Need significant effort on handling of sparsity with concatenating dimensions
- More flexible on conditional formatting, allow to configure the conditions with formula instead of a rigid line item
- We have a customer in Foods Industry got their budgeting cycle reduced from 3 months to 1 month
- In a big retail customer, 1% revenue uplift by optimizing stores layout
- Released man power in BU from streamlining planning process
Jedox has limited the standard dimensions to 6 only in the financial workspace. If you need any other custom dimension, it has to be defined in analytical workspace. However, data interchange between Financial Workspace and Analytical workspaces are not real-time and rely on customizing the data interchange process by SQL statement.
In which, Anaplan does not have this limitation in number of dimensions in the model, and all modules can be linked with formula. Any changes in one of the module would be reflected in other modules linked in real-time.
The effort of implementation is easier and the overall user-experience is better.
In which, Anaplan does not have this limitation in number of dimensions in the model, and all modules can be linked with formula. Any changes in one of the module would be reflected in other modules linked in real-time.
The effort of implementation is easier and the overall user-experience is better.
Do you think Anaplan delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Anaplan's feature set?
Yes
Did Anaplan live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Anaplan go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Anaplan again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation