AutoCAD review from a casual user
September 12, 2019

AutoCAD review from a casual user

Daniel Quinn | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with AutoCAD

AutoCAD is used on a per case basis as required for an event. Typically as a business, we use 3D modeling software and pull AutoCAD out when complex 3D designs need to be completed more accurately. I prefer to design and measure in AutoCAD and export out for fancier rendering requirements. AutoCAD is a great design tool when accuracy is required.
  • Architectural design.
  • System flow design.
  • Material design and application.
  • The user interface has an extremely steep learning curve.
  • Blocks/symbols integration is sometimes hard to understand.
  • Limited material database.
  • Hard one to put ROI on. Anything that assists in accurately designing work before installations though is to be applauded.
AutoCAD has its place as the ultimate design tool when complexity is required. However, for simpler work or getting 3D designs out quickly, I will revert to TurboCAD. For a fast 3D design that does not require overall accuracy or fidelity, I will open SketchUp. For animation, I will typically turn to Maya.
I have not had to get support for AutoCAD.

Do you think AutoCAD delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with AutoCAD's feature set?

Yes

Did AutoCAD live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of AutoCAD go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy AutoCAD again?

Yes

AutoCAD isn't suited for abstract modelling and rendering work, where more artistic input is required with less accuracy. There are better products for that.