Azure Arc
Overall Satisfaction with Azure Arc
We have been seeking for a unified monitoring solution for both our on-premise servers, both Windows server and Linux, as well as all our Cloud Azure-based servers. Azure Arc has been able to provide a single pane of monitoring solution for all our hybrid cloud infrastructure components in an efficient manner.
Pros
- Azure Monitor metrics
- Event logs aggregation
- Integration with Windows Admin Center
Cons
- Debian, Ubuntu and CentOS operating system version support is limited and reaching end of life soon
- Azure Arc-enabled data services for Postgresql and SQL Managed Instance have some limitations, we would like to see them becoming more stable with a broader feature set.
- While configuring the Azure Connected Machine agent on some Linux machines, we had to carry out troubleshooting to get them to work, we would like to see the agents for Linux even more stable in future releases.
- After configuring Azure Arc-enabled services on premise for SQL Server, we saw a drastic decrease in our Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) by 30%
- After working with Azure Arc monitoring agents installed in our on-prem Windows and Linux users, we documented a 20% increase in overall IT operations efficiency, due to the unified monitoring solution.
- The Azure Arc-enabled servers security baseline provides procedural guidance and resources for implementing security recommendations and best practices. This has increased operational efficiency and decreased security incidents by 15%.
Do you think Azure Arc delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Azure Arc's feature set?
Yes
Did Azure Arc live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Azure Arc go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Azure Arc again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation