CentOS - Absolutely the best value for the money
Overall Satisfaction with CentOS
We use CentOS for all of our Linux hosts and Linux containers, for webservers as well as application servers, and addresses the need for a solid platform to run generic code, without worrying about licensing or justifying initial cost.
Pros
- As it is derived from the commercial Red Hat Enterprise Linux distribution, most instructions for installing enterprise software on Red Hat also work on CentOS, including the package manager.
- CentOS lags behind Fedora (the other free Red Hat derivative supported by Red Hat), which makes it a solid choice for the enterprise (or even SMBs - stability is universally appreciated!).
Cons
- CentOS isn't (and may never be) a strong contender for a desktop (GUI) Linux distribution.
- The cost of ownership is debatable, but the purchase price is zero dollars ($0), which is hard to argue with.
- Ubuntu Linux, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and SUSE Linux Enterprise Server
When the rubber meets the road, any Linux distribution will do. However, RHEL and distributions that are derived from RHEL have a fantastic ecosystem of users, software packages, and documentation (which is generally compatible between RHEL-derived distributions) that make it easy to jump into CentOS, a derivative specifically designed as a slow-release free distribution.
Do you think CentOS Linux delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with CentOS Linux's feature set?
Yes
Did CentOS Linux live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of CentOS Linux go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy CentOS Linux again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation