Best on-prem way to manage wifi
Updated March 13, 2025
Best on-prem way to manage wifi

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Modules Used
- Cisco Catalyst 9800-CL Wireless Controller
- Cisco Catalyst 9800-L Wireless Controller
- Cisco Catalyst 9800-EWC Wireless Controller
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers
On-prem WLC is the way to go in challenging environments like a warehouse, you have much bigger control on fine-tuning the radio settings than what you can achieve with cloud based solutions. If you combine it with Cisco Catalyst Center, you even gain a great level of visibility both on APs and wireless clients.
Pros
- Possibility of fine tuning all settings
- Easy to use GUI and a traditional IOS-XE CLI
- Flexibility in deployment options
Cons
- Sad that many new features are not directly integrated but accessible only via Catalyst Center
- The virtual version is for free, so ROI is pretty easy
- Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points and Cisco Catalyst Center
All works well as a single ecosystem.
It's very simple to apply the same set of configuration on multiple access point based on AP naming and tagging system.
Cisco is more industrial grade
Do you think Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers again?
Yes
Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers Feature Ratings
Using Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers
15000 - Wireless services
10 - Network team
- AP management
- RF controls
- Security controls
Evaluating Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers and Competitors
Yes - AireOS controllers, Aruba
- Integration with Other Systems
- Ease of Use
Integration to Cisco ecosystem
There is no real alternative on the market
Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Change management was minimal
Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers Training
- No Training
If you have experience with other systems, online documentation will be helpful, maybe some Cisco Live presentations can help as well.
Configuring Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers
Follow the official best practices guide!
No - there is no facility to customize the interface
No - the product does not support adding custom code
You need to tune it according your organization's needs.
Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Support cares about my success Quick Initial Response | Escalation required Difficult to get immediate help Need to explain problems multiple times |
Yes, in enterprise environment it's a must.
It happened that I made a mistake when cloning a controller, and I simply couldn't figure out where's the issue, TAC engineer was able to quickly point it out, even though it was a quite special use case.
Using Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Convenient Feel confident using | None |
- Tagging
- RF tuning
- Understanding all the special config options
Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers Reliability
Integrating Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers
- ISE
- Catalyst Center
All these work well in Cisco ecosystem.
You'll need at least a radius server + for new features Catalyst Center is a must.
Relationship with Cisco
Upgrading Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers
Yes - Upgrading is theoretically possible with ISSU and vey minimal downtime, but this never really worked for me, always failed with some error. However normal upgrade always worked and overall it doesn't take more than 15 minutes of downtime, which is usually not impossible to schedule in an enterprise environment either.
- New features
- Support for new AP models
- Bugfixes, security fixes
- New features
- Bugfixes
Yes - Went from virtual to physical to eliminate dependency on server environment.

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation