Cisco Catalyst Switches Review
February 28, 2019

Cisco Catalyst Switches Review

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Modules Used

  • Cisco Catalyst 3850 Series

Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Catalyst Switches

  • Catalyst 2960 X/XR Series
  • Catalyst 2960-L Series
  • Catalyst 3850 Series
We use the 2960-L for the use of lots of ports for low cost, with all the benefits of the Cisco IOS software.

The 2960-X, with stacking, we use at locations where they want more redundancy or where we need a lot of ports.

The 3850's are used with stacking and power stacking in our data center for high availability and high bandwidth.
  • The same configuration is available on almost all of the switches.
  • We manage all our Cisco switches (14 different models) at over more than 200 location with one tool. This is possible because of the compatibility of the software.
  • Best of all, the switch is really good and stable.
  • Out of the box central management for multiple versions and lots of locations.
  • We have used Cisco Catalyst Switches for more than 10 years and have had very few issues.
  • The initial cost of the Cisco Catalyst Switches is higher than some competitors, but over a lifetime of at least 5 years, the ROI is fine.
Not all of these features are available for older models. We have 14 types of switches in production and try to keep them at a baseline for compatibility, so we rarely use this function currently.
All management of the Catalyst is done by four tools:
  • PRTG for monitoring.
  • Own build PowerShell for updating every month.
  • Own build PowerShell for getting or deploying configuration on all the devices.
  • Cisco APIC-EM is used for the 2960-L switches to deploy configurations in the field.
Cisco Catalyst Switches have kept compatibility over the years, where HP and Huawei are changing this over time
We always use Cisco Catalyst Switches at customer location because of the stability they offer.