Overall Satisfaction with Control-M
Currently, in our project, we are using Control-M to schedule and automate the regular jobs. We have installed the Control-M agent on our IBM AIX server where applications are hosted. The jobs perform operations of copying daily user data from one server to another server. It simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on-premises or as a service.
- It reduces the manual efforts.
- Control-M agent is not consuming high resources on server.
- It gets started automatically.
We prefer the Control-C over the IBM Workload Automation because it isn't supported on all available OS platforms in our project. Second, we are getting excellent customer support from the vendor in case of any critical issue comes in operations. Control-M is a light weight tool which consume less resources from the server.
Do you think Control-M delivers good value for the price?
Are you happy with Control-M's feature set?
Did Control-M live up to sales and marketing promises?
Did implementation of Control-M go as expected?
Would you buy Control-M again?
We are supporting a client where we need to copy user-provided data to a centralized server. We have installed Control-M agent and it is now doing this work for us. When new entries have been made by a user it identifies and starts copying the new data to the centralized server effectively.