The Control-M Review
Updated December 17, 2024
The Control-M Review

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Control-M
We use it for running scripts, MFT to Cloud and much more. We use Control-M API, Forecast and running appx 700 jobs a day. We are planning to move to Helix for Control-M but maybe year 2027. We transfer file to Kubernetes, Google Cloud Storage and Ms Azure Blob Storage.
Pros
- Awesome scheduling
- Awesome File Transfer
- Very well documented API
Cons
- The Desktop Client is much better than the Web Client.
- Keeping SLAs
25 - Developers and Product Owners
Do you think Control-M delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Control-M's feature set?
Yes
Did Control-M live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Control-M go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Control-M again?
Yes
Control-M Feature Ratings
Using Control-M
3 - Unix, Scripting, Windows Server and knowledge about Cloud technology. SQL knowledge is also good to have. I think it is also important to have some social skills. You will need to talk to people in your organisation (developers, Product Owners etc) and convince them and make them understand the full potential of Control-M
- Kubernetes MFT
- Running scripts
- MFT to Cloud Services
- We use Control-M API for Self Service reporting
- More Kuberenetes integation
- SAP orchestration

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation