Control-M: The Ultimate Tool for Workflow Management.
Updated June 25, 2025
Control-M: The Ultimate Tool for Workflow Management.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Modules Used
- Managed File Transfer
- Self Service
- Workload Archiving
- Automation API/Jobs-as-Code
- Application Integrator
Overall Satisfaction with Control-M
By automating job scheduling, Control-M reduces the risk of human error that can occur with manual scheduling. Control-M provides detailed logs and reports, which are essential for compliance and auditing purposes. The tool also provides real-time monitoring and alerts, enabling quick response to any issues that arise.
Pros
- Increased confidence that SLAs are being met for Control-M users and IT leaders.
- Enhanced dashboards and reporting with constant telemetry and intelligent analysis on executing workflows.
- In-depth reporting to help teams work autonomously.
Cons
- Sometimes, jobs fail without clear reasons. That needs to be improved. Licensing costs could be improved, especially for small and mid-sized businesses. Some bugs affect our daily activities after applying patch releases or version updates. Testing should be more thorough before a release when they have any release or update.
- Control-M has demonstrated significant ROI across various business objectives.
- By automating labor-intensive batch processing tasks, Control-M has significantly helped organizations reduce operational costs.
- Control-M enables businesses to scale their operations without a proportional increase in headcount.
- By reducing the time required to promote new workloads by 50%, Control-M helps businesses bring new services and products to market faster, potentially increasing revenue1.
50 - Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application.
Control-M stands out in the workload automation space for its robust orchestration capabilities, especially in complex, hybrid IT environmentsActiveBatch: Known for its rich integrations and intuitive workflow designer,
ActiveBatch often scores higher in ease of use and built-in features. However, Control-M offers deeper enterprise-grade orchestration and predictive analytics for SLA management
Why Choose Control-M
Enterprise-
Grade Orchestration:
It supports complex workflows across on-prem, cloud, and hybrid environments.
ActiveBatch often scores higher in ease of use and built-in features. However, Control-M offers deeper enterprise-grade orchestration and predictive analytics for SLA management
Why Choose Control-M
Enterprise-
Grade Orchestration:
It supports complex workflows across on-prem, cloud, and hybrid environments.
Do you think Control-M delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Control-M's feature set?
Yes
Did Control-M live up to sales and marketing promises?
No
Did implementation of Control-M go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Control-M again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation