Infrastructure as a Service with high availability at lower cost
February 23, 2026
Infrastructure as a Service with high availability at lower cost

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Google Compute Engine
We use Google Compute Engine (GCE) as an Infrastructure as a Service to run some medium-scale workloads of the application. We also use it to run web servers for internal usage. It is very convenient to create, deploy and scale instances based on the demand and it integrates very well with other cloud services.
Pros
- zero downtime maintenance
- great global load balancing
- automatic discounts
Cons
- very complex pricing
- learning curve
- difficult user interface (lot of options)
- positive: reduced costs + budget alerts
- negative: initial migration because the app was not optimized for the cloud
- Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
- Microsoft Azure
Rather than saying GCE is better. I would say that depends on the business and technical requirements it might fit better than others. There is no silver bullet.
Do you think Google Compute Engine delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Google Compute Engine's feature set?
Yes
Did Google Compute Engine live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Google Compute Engine go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Google Compute Engine again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation