Reliable and cost effective Flash of IBM
Updated September 19, 2023
Reliable and cost effective Flash of IBM
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Modules Used
- IBM Flashsystem 7200
Overall Satisfaction with IBM Storage FlashSystem
It is mainly targeted to cater to the needs of high-end IOs from different applications across the organization. Mainly focused on delivering mission-critical servers with low latency disk access. This helps us to reduce a significant amount of time while running jobs on various applications across different domains. The storage has been deployed to use across different divisions in the company.
Pros
- Performance is the crucial element to be highlighted, as it delivers the best in class industry performance.
- Guaranteed compression ratio, one of the leading in [the] industry we got a 2:1 guaranteed and it achieved as per the commitment.
- Reliability is one of the main elements which works really well, even being a storewide family product it delivers [the] best reliability features.
- [The] footprint is key, as it helped us to reduce our organization's 2 racks storage capacity into a 2U rack space.
Cons
- Better GUI interface
- Currently, [the] performance of FS7200 can't be monitored through TPC/SC, this should be considered to include in [the] future.
- IBM primarily lacks in designing its products physical looks, should have designed more intrusive and attractive design. A first impression of the product creates [an] impressive opinion.
- There is a significant improvement for OLTP applications.
- Jobs run/execution time reduced by around 70%.
- Saving significant amount of cost in cooling and power.
- Savings on spending management/administration cost, as the product is straightforward to maintain with in-house engineers.
IBM Storage FlashSystem Feature Ratings
Using IBM Storage FlashSystem
5000 - Mainly core applications such as internal employee payroll, [a] crucial oil-related application which is primarily used for exploration, the discovery of oil using seismic data.
2 - Majorly managed/administered by skilled staff who are trained on Storage/SAN technologies and have [been] hands-on for quite some time. But this particular model can be managed by a staff intermediate skill on storage/SAN.
- OLTP Applications
- Oil discovery
- Seismic data analysis
- In-house applications
- Planning to use as staging space to [speed up] the backups as the environment is already equipped with high-speed data transfer from servers to storage.
Evaluating IBM Storage FlashSystem and Competitors
Yes - We had replaced our current portfolio of Flash Storage 820 with a unified [IBM FlashSystem] 7200, main reason is to consolidate the environment and reduce the footprint. Secondly, to reduce the cost and unify all the storage arrays/small xylos into a single and robust environment. Lastly, maintenance cost is the key in choosing [IBM FlashSystem] 7200 over smalled FS820 arrays.
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
Mainly we are focused on product stability/robustness along with price factor and support are the key metrics in opting for [IBM FlashSystem] 7200 over other peers in the market.
If I get an opportunity to re-evaluate, I consider including the compression feature as the key parameter. I feel IBM products are lacking in offering compression ratio compared to peers in the market.
IBM Storage FlashSystem Implementation
- Implemented in-house
- Third-party professional services
One of the leading partner of IBM and sole distributor helped us to build our storage flash portfolio
Change management was a minor issue with the implementation - There is nothing specific, as its a regular device replacement or addition of new hardware to the storage portfolio
- No significant issues, its a smooth process
IBM Storage FlashSystem Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Kept well informed Immediate help available Support understands my problem Support cares about my success | None |
support will be provided by local Business Partner, due to the regional constraints
When we had a fire suppression incident, we lost most of the hardware components. IBM support taken it as a challenge and supported us through out the crisis and helped us to come out of the catastrophic situation
Using IBM Storage FlashSystem
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using | Lots to learn |
- compression is in build due to the usage of FCM modules, this is seamless to the user but a prominent feature to be highlighted
- seamless data migration/copy across Flash array
- GUI should have better interface
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation