A tad on the pricey side, but still a great value
Overall Satisfaction with Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
The Imperva WAF acts as our go-between (proxy) for our public-facing websites. They intercept known bad actor IPs, and we can also block certain countries that have shown to be problematic and we don't do business in. More dynamic attacks are also detected and blocked, making this largely a "fire and forget" tool. We rarely even need to log into the tool, except to pull our weekly reports.
Pros
- Block some dynamic attacks such as SQL injection.
- Block unfriendly accesses based on geographic source.
- Helps us implement SSL in cases where the original server can't (yet).
Cons
- The UI can use a little work (but is largely decent)
- Our on-prem firewall has less work to do, allowing it more cycles for other tasks.
- We have better web traffic visibility and control over what actors are doing outside our network.
Ultimately, it was the easiest to work with that was still a "known" company (we've been burned too many times by up-and-comers). We needed something that gave us a lot of control but then didn't need its handheld on a daily basis. Imperva gives us a lot of that and we are still able to navigate it with ease.
Do you think Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)'s feature set?
Yes
Did Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation