Overall Satisfaction with Kemp LoadMaster
My company is using Kemp Loadmaster as load balancer for Exchange deployments, ADFS infrastructure and also for webserver farms with custom applications. Additionally, the reverse proxy feature with pre-authentication is used in some setups. We are a consulting/hosting company and have many customers using Kemp technology.
- Ease of use - configuration is simple and there are templates for many use cases.
- Support is awesome. If we ever ran into issues with more complex setups, we got quick help.
- Value for money compared to competitors.
- Integration into monitoring solutions is possible but could be more intuitive.
- The web-based interface sometimes needs a manual refresh to show the actual status of services.
- We used Kemp LoadMaster for many projects. For a lot of customers, load balancers were too expensive or too complicated before we introduced Kemp products.
- It's not a overly complicated product, so we were able to train many engineers on it and have them get a certification.
- Citrix ADC (formerly NetScaler ADC) and F5 BIG-IP
Kemp LoadMaster is easier to implement and operate, all while being less expensive. Although some competitors offer more functionality, most of our customers don't need it.
Do you think Kemp LoadMaster delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Kemp LoadMaster's feature set?
Yes
Did Kemp LoadMaster live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Kemp LoadMaster go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Kemp LoadMaster again?
Yes