Like a marketing automation butler—smart, smooth and efficient
Overall Satisfaction with Marketo
We use Marketo to support our lead generation and nurturing efforts. Marketo supports our lead acquisition efforts through landing pages and emails, and its tracking capabilities allow us to engage with leads in a way that reflects their demographics and behavior, as well as provide the marketing, sales and finance team with visibility throughout the sales funnel.
Pros
- Lead scoring—easy to see what leads are doing and who they are, and use that information to serve up relevant content and direct sales team activities.
- Integration—seamless integration with Salesforce.
- Automation—trigger campaigns make it easy to set up workflows and can be customized to a reasonable degree.
Cons
- Design for landing pages and emails—have come a long way in the past year, including adding true responsive functionality, but still would like landing pages and emails to be easier to design and customize.
- Analytics—built-in reports are lacking and cannot be customized. You can buy additional analytics tools, but for an enterprise automation tool those capabilities should be baked into the base tool.
- Forms—would like the full set of features available for forms embedded on non-native pages (e.g., form pre-fill for known leads).
- Increased conversion rate
- Better alignment between marketing and sales
- Faster setup for campaigns
- Better reporting
HubSpot seemed to be more suited for smaller companies. We asked for references of companies of a similar size, and they instead directed us to people at very small companies—a few were ~10 people. Also, some of the areas where HubSpot is stronger than Marketo were not priorities for us. For example, having a blog built in HubSpot—our entire website is built in WordPress, so that would be a negative instead of a positive.
25,000 to 100,000


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation