Overall Satisfaction with Portainer
Being a authentic boostraper, I am constantly seeking for crystal-clear evidences to better organizing my computing frameworks. Docker has brought a lot of sense to deploying software but lacks in visualization of its power. Portainer has been a revelation becoming the ideal dashboard for us building computing frameworks through iterations. Thank you for this abstraction layer!
- Ease of reconfiguration/re-deployment
- Storing secrets & configs securely (swarm-mode)
- Visualizing the deployed instances and the resources used
- An integrated performance usage dashboard
- A graphical visualisation of the linking port:port, secrets, services, volumes, etc...
- Failed deployments are not always evident and require more than standard error messages
- Portainer is easy to setup
- Portainer is easy to understand & use
- Portainer brings clarity in the visualisation of the deployed services
- Portainer has made our RnD PoC deployments easy
- Portainer provides a simply & efficient licensing scheme
- Portainer makes you save money by leveraging architecture over complexity
- Docker, SUSE Rancher and Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Portainer has made our rapid prototyping an easy task without requesting too much, especially while deploying micro-services on a self-deployed AMI instance. Above all, Portainer enables all configurations that we were expecting to be feasible, becoming the evident choice number one.
Do you think Portainer delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Portainer's feature set?
Yes
Did Portainer live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Portainer go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Portainer again?
Yes