Powerful easy-to-implement controls across many platforms
September 02, 2025
Powerful easy-to-implement controls across many platforms

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Progress Telerik
We've used Progress Telerik for several MAUI and WinUI3 apps. We've found it very helpful for controls like rich text editing and tabs that seem common but for some reason do not have great tooling built-in (or in the community toolkit). So ultimately, we used Progress Telerik to plug the gap in several different platforms where the built-in tooling was not sufficient.
Pros
- The Rich Text Editor on desktop is fantastic
- The control styles are easy to customize
- Controls work well out of the box while still allowing for a certain amount of customization
Cons
- Native and community toolkit controls are more intuitive to customize. We found that if we are doing deep customization, Progress Telerik controls do not always behave the way you would expect.
- We've tried other third party controls (syncfusion, etc.) and burned significant time trying to get them to work. Progress Telerik is the only one that stuck. Developer time on this kind of thing is rather expensive, I don't have hard numbers but spending dozens of hours on a product that doesn't do what you want is not great.
- Syncfusion® Essential Studio®
We didn't use SyncFusion for long. We found that if you did anything custom, the controls simply didn't behave the way you would expect. Very annoying for us.
Do you think Progress Telerik delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Progress Telerik's feature set?
Yes
Did Progress Telerik live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Progress Telerik go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Progress Telerik again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation