Pure Storage FlashArray: simplicity, ease, and performance
Updated April 07, 2021
Pure Storage FlashArray: simplicity, ease, and performance
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Pure Storage FlashArray
We use Pure Storage FlashArray across the whole organization. It is our primary enterprise storage for general purposes from database to virtualization data. So far we have had an excellent return of investment with high performance and low latency. Pre-sales and after-sales support have been very positive.
Pros
- Simple management
- High performance
- Excellent support
- Quick installation and setup
Cons
- Trend line in local management
- Performance analysis for more concurrent disks
- More accurate data reduction information by volume.
- About 30% reduction in database backup times.
- Sustained latency below 1 ms with 1.5 GB / s load
- Good performance with data from diverse sources
As a government organization, we cannot just choose a specific product for purchase, so Pure FlashArray was one of the participants that was able to meet the needs of the purchasing process. In proof of concept it proved simpler and more versatile than the HPE solution in the circumstances of our environment.
Pure Storage FlashArray Feature Ratings
Upgrading Pure Storage FlashArray
Yes - Update occurred as expected, with no impact or downtime.
- Periodic update without further functionality to be used by the corporation. Preventive update only.
- Use of NVMeOF functionality.
Simplicity
Using Pure Storage FlashArray
15 - Third-level technical support team.
15 - Technical team with basic knowledge of storages is important. Highlighting snapshot features, replication, volume creation are desirable.
- Primary storage
- Data Bases
- Server Files
- Virtual machines
- Integration with NVMeOF
Do you think Pure Storage FlashArray delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Pure Storage FlashArray's feature set?
Yes
Did Pure Storage FlashArray live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Pure Storage FlashArray go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Pure Storage FlashArray again?
Yes
Evaluating Pure Storage FlashArray and Competitors
Yes - It replaced much of the primary storage previously used in a hybrid IBM storage.
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Product Reputation
Performance was the main item for acquiring a primary storage, for use in enterprise applications. Usability issues and the reputation of the supplier and product are the basis for any company acquisitions.
Satisfaction with the product showed that the acquisition was acertive, so we would only review to update performance indices and possible new functionalities.
Pure Storage FlashArray Training
Pure Storage FlashArray Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Kept well informed Immediate help available Support understands my problem Support cares about my success Quick Initial Response | None |
Yes. Because the product was purchased for critical corporate use.
During a firmware upgrade procedure, support has identified a lack of redundancy on one of our hosts by communicating and providing time to resolve the issue without interruption of service. This was a proactive attitude. We had trouble with UEFI boot. Support reported as soon as the option was made available for the firmware to be updated.
Using Pure Storage FlashArray
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- Configuration of Volumes
- Snapshots operations
- None identified
Yes, but I don't use it
Pure Storage FlashArray Reliability
Integrating Pure Storage FlashArray
- Windows Servers
- Linux Servers
- Data Bases Servers
Native integration via SAN with no identified problem.
- NVMeOF
We intend to make use of NVMeOF features in the future, but for this we will need to both perform updates to the operating system and to make switches servers and infrastructure available with such capacity.
Relationship with Pure Storage
Storage capacity, snapshot resources, and NVMe technologies disks.
It seems to me that each case should be evaluated particularly with the supplier facing the customer's needs. There's no rule of rule.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation