Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) From a Longterm User
May 21, 2025

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) From a Longterm User

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

We use RHEL images as our primary OS for deploying monolith applications.

Pros

  • File System Management
  • Authentication and Access
  • Package Management
  • Repository Management
  • Security Updates

Cons

  • Network Utilities
  • Interfacing with external Identity Providers like AD
  • Satellite
  • Licensing was very easy and scalable
  • New OS and features are open source and easy to prototype before committing
Overall RHEL has maintained much of the core functionality of Fedora but between version there are significant differences between versions from the of utils.

Do you think Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)'s feature set?

Yes

Did Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) again?

Yes

RHEL is very well suited for large enterprise scale applications that are FEDRAMP compliant. Patches are provided on a timely basis. Even libraries that are out of support, are often independently maintained by Red hat. Where it needs work is some of the Network Utilities and OS system parameters. These have changed through each iteration of RHEL and it takes time to re-learn how some core components operate.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Feature Ratings

Resource Allocation
7
File Management
Not Rated
Hardware Device Management
Not Rated
Software Application Management
Not Rated
System Update Frequency
Not Rated
Operating System Security
Not Rated

Comments

More Reviews of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)