Sakai
Updated February 05, 2016

Sakai

Samantha J. Blevins | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 1 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Software Version

All

Modules Used

  • All

Overall Satisfaction with Sakai

Sakai was used as a the sole learning management system at our university for the purposes of managing learning and research projects. Currently, our university is transitioning away from Sakai toward Canvas.
  • Organization of content
  • Customization of course navigation and content
  • Small learning curve compared to other systems
  • Ease of use and customization of ePortfolio
  • Tests and Quizzes
  • ePortfolio
  • Ability to customize the system to meet the needs of faculty and learners
  • Greater cost to the university as a whole than a hosted platform
  • Ability to easily design courses based on pedagogy
I did not personally select Sakai. However, it is fairly easy to use and customize. That being said, this product is being abandoned by developers/universities and should not be adopted by an organization.
This system no longer meets the needs of the university and developers have been abandoning the project. Adopting it now could only lead to user frustration, as adoption of another LMS platform would be inevitable.

Using Sakai

30000 - These are faculty, staff and students at our university who are still using Sakai. Our campus is now transitioning to Canvas.
50 - These employees were valuable in their ability to relate to the needs of faculty, staff, and students. In addition, employees almost always went above and beyond the call of duty to support client use of Sakai.
  • building community
  • facilitating learning experiences
  • collaborating on research
  • to create an ongoing community of learners within a subject area
We won't be renewing. We are transitioning to Canvas.

Evaluating Sakai and Competitors

Yes - Blackboard was replaced due to their focus on k-12 and increasing cost.
  • Price
  • Product Usability
The most important factor was the ability to become a developer school for Sakai, having direct influence on the product and being able to incorporate the needs of faculty and staff.
I was not part of this process.

Sakai Implementation

Yes - It was a very long transition, which helped get most faculty and staff on board.

Sakai Support

Our university did in house support and did an excellent job.
ProsCons
Quick Resolution
Good followup
Knowledgeable team
Problems get solved
Kept well informed
No escalation required
Immediate help available
Support understands my problem
Support cares about my success
Quick Initial Response
None
Yes - Our developers and technical support were quick to remedy the issue or find a work around.
I don't know what Apereo is.

Using Sakai

It was easy for me to use, and easy for most of our faculty to catch on.
ProsCons
Like to use
Relatively simple
Easy to use
Technical support not required
Well integrated
Quick to learn
Convenient
Feel confident using
Inconsistent
Lots to learn
  • Tests/quizzes
  • posting material
  • discussion boards