Low-Code, High Potential: Reviewing SAP Build’s Capabilities
December 28, 2024
Low-Code, High Potential: Reviewing SAP Build’s Capabilities

Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Modules Used
- SAP Build Process Automation
- SAP Build Apps
Overall Satisfaction with SAP Build
We mainly use SAP Build for developing POCs for our end clients. Those use cases tend to exist of simple apps meant to extend cloud products such as SAP S/4HANA and Sales/Service Cloud, as well as automate approval workflows to manage data processes (e.g., creation of Business Partners, Products, ...). Additionally, we've performed limited tests for RPA processes to help streamline repetitive tasks.
Pros
- Great tool for rapid prototyping
- Potential for citizen developers (although currently in practice still need a lot of input for most scenarios from more technical colleagues)
- Decent integration with the SAP ecosystem
Cons
- Workflow automation is still limited, especially when it comes to presenting forms dynamically for _much_ increased user-friendliness (and thus higher end user adoption)
- Pro-code tool should be more readily accessible in order to cover more use cases
- Monitoring and logging, especially division between technical and non-technical errors and how they get presented to relevant end users
- SAP Build has allowed us to quickly recreate an on-premise legacy software with minimal effort, enabling the customer to not only migrate a crucial process to the cloud but also automate and improve many of its steps.
- RPA has allowed us to automate much of the order processing coming in via email for one of our customers, significantly reducing manual effort and minimizing errors.
- SAP Build has helped us secure several implementation projects by reducing development effort, enabling a positive ROI within acceptable timeframes for decision-makers.
We have successfully integrated both SAP Build applications and our custom workflow forms with S/4HANA on-premises through data exchange mechanisms, as well as with Sales and Service Cloud version 2 using embedding and mash-up techniques. As the latter does not allow any direct customizing (unlike version 1), this accessible option for extending the core product has allowed us to convince a customer to become an early adopter of that new cloud technology.
We have helped streamline and implement a custom workflow to create business partners that has replaced the traditional back-and-forth emailing between departments, which often resulted in multiple sources of truth. This new centralized, combined creation-and-approval flow gathers input from key users at relevant stages of the creation process, ensuring a more efficient and organized approach.
Do you think SAP Build delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with SAP Build's feature set?
Yes
Did SAP Build live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of SAP Build go as expected?
No
Would you buy SAP Build again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation