Growing strong
Updated December 04, 2025

Growing strong

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with SAP Business Technology Platform

We are using AI Core, AI launchpad and SAP Build services to build custom solutions on SAP Eco Systems. We also exploring Joule Skill extensions to extend skills and build new agents. Cloud Foundry is useful as well to deploy Python APIs as well.

Pros

  • SAP Build Platform
  • SAP AI Core
  • SAP AI Launchpad

Cons

  • Adding more LLMs
  • Libraries to use SDKs in other langauges
  • Cost is on higher
  • Ease of development and deployment is a plus
I have built an agentic solution using SAP Business Technology Platform.
I have seen but not used the use cases

Do you think SAP Business Technology Platform delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with SAP Business Technology Platform's feature set?

Yes

Did SAP Business Technology Platform live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of SAP Business Technology Platform go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy SAP Business Technology Platform again?

Yes

Tightly integrated SAP Eco System and authentication is an advantage to secure organization's data.

SAP Business Technology Platform Feature Ratings

Ease of building user interfaces
10
Scalability
10
Platform management overhead
10
Workflow engine capability
10
Platform access control
10
Services-enabled integration
10
Development environment creation
10
Development environment replication
10
Issue monitoring and notification
10
Issue recovery
10
Upgrades and platform fixes
10

Using SAP Business Technology Platform

5 - We currently have a small core team of about five active SAP BTP users. They sit across IT and business functions, including:An IT/BTP platform owner and a cloud administrator who manage the global account, subaccounts, security, and connectivity to our SAP and non‑SAP systems. Integration and application developers who build and maintain extensions, APIs, and integrations on SAP BTP, mainly around S/4HANA and other line‑of‑business systems.
5 - SAP BTP administrator / platform engineer – manages global account and subaccounts, cockpit configuration, Cloud Connector, destinations, environments (Cloud Foundry/ABAP), basic networking, and overall monitoring and operations. Integration specialist – works with SAP Integration Suite, API Management, and event-based integrations to connect S/4HANA and other SAP or non-SAP systems running on or connected to BTP. Application developer – builds and maintains BTP-based extensions and apps (for example with CAP, Fiori/UI5, and SAP HANA), and follows “clean core” and cloud-native development practices.
  • Custom Agentic AI
  • Customer Portal
  • Invoice Upload using SAP Build Automation
  • Smart workflow and approval hubs
  • Document- and data-intelligent apps
  • Predictive and AI-driven insights on operational data
  • Joule Skills and Agent Extension
  • SAP Side by Side Extensions on SAP ABAP Cloud to support Clean Core
  • Deeper AI and predictive use cases
I find everything available on SAP BTP which is sufficient enough to extend my SAP S/4 HANA System. Plus, I have more computation power when it comes to LLM or AI as well. SAP BTP has the cockpit as well to provide services you need. I find it well organized.

Evaluating SAP Business Technology Platform and Competitors

What offerings are available on the platform and how easy it is to deploy and use on the platform.

SAP Business Technology Platform Implementation

A few insights from our implementation experience are worth calling out.​Spend enough time up front on account/subaccount design, regions, and naming, otherwise you will keep revisiting it as you scale.Keep a strict “clean core” mindset and decide early which extensions stay in S/4HANA and which move to BTP.Invest in landing-zone basics (connectivity, identities, roles, transport process, monitoring) before rolling out too many apps.
  • Learning the skills
  • Understanding BTP Deployments and offerings

SAP Business Technology Platform Training

  • Online Training
  • No Training
Rating it 8 out of 10 reflects that SAP’s online training for BTP is generally very solid: the content is structured, up to date, and covers both fundamentals and practical scenarios with good hands‑on exercises. However, there is still room to improve depth on advanced topics and offer more real‑world, end‑to‑end implementation examples, which is why it is not a perfect 10.
SAP BTP was not something the team could just “pick up” without any training, especially for topics like security, subaccount design, and integrations. Some self‑learning and experimentation helped, but structured online courses and documentation made a big difference, so learning without training is not recommended for most teams.

Configuring SAP Business Technology Platform

For a platform like SAP BTP, the configurability feels “just right,” but it can definitely seem extensive and complex at first. There are many options across services, security, and subaccount setup, so it requires governance and standards, yet this flexibility is exactly what is needed to handle diverse extension, integration, and data scenarios across an enterprise landscape.
Yes, a few best practices have helped a lot in keeping our BTP landscape manageable and secure.​Design global account and subaccounts upfront (by landscape, region, and purpose) and stick to clear naming and tagging standards.Apply a strict least‑privilege model for roles, role collections, and spaces, and centralize identity/SSO early.Standardize transports, logging, and monitoring so every app follows the same deployment and operations pattern.
No - we have not done any customization to the interface
Yes - we have added extensive custom code - Yes, we have added custom code on SAP BTP, mainly to run an Agentic AI solution developed in Python and integrate it with our SAP landscape. Using BTP services (runtime, destinations, and authentication), it was reasonably straightforward once the architecture was clear, though it still required solid knowledge of BTP security, connectivity, and deployment pipelines to get everything running smoothly.
Two things are worth mentioning.​We have set up a standardized subaccount and space structure with common destinations, logging, and monitoring so new apps follow the same pattern instead of one‑off setups.We also customized role collections and IAS/IDP groups to align with our internal job roles, which made access control and SSO much smoother for end users.

SAP Business Technology Platform Support

ProsCons
Quick Resolution
Good followup
Knowledgeable team
Problems get solved
Kept well informed
Immediate help available
Support cares about my success
Quick Initial Response
None
No, we have not purchased premium support for SAP BTP. Given our current scale and limited number of mission‑critical workloads, the standard support included in our SAP agreements has been sufficient so far. For now, we prefer to invest in internal skills and good platform practices rather than pay extra for an upgraded support tier.
There was a notable incident during a production deployment where a new BTP integration started failing intermittently and impacting a critical business process. SAP support engaged quickly, pulled in both BTP and backend experts, helped us narrow down the root cause, and provided a clear workaround plus a permanent fix within a short time window. Their responsiveness and willingness to stay on calls until things were stable really stood out as exceptional support.

Using SAP Business Technology Platform

ProsCons
Like to use
Relatively simple
Easy to use
Well integrated
Quick to learn
Feel confident using
Lots to learn
  • SAP AI Launchpad
  • SAP Business Application Studio
  • SAP HANA Database
  • SAP Build
  • SAP Single Sign On
  • SAP Access Management Configuration on Applications
  • SAP Fiori Apps for each API

SAP Business Technology Platform Reliability

An 8 out of 10 reflects that SAP BTP scales very well in practice, both technically and organizationally, as more apps, users, and departments are added. The underlying cloud services, multi‑subaccount setup, and integration options comfortably support growth, but the complexity of governance, cost control, and cross‑landscape coordination keeps it from being a perfect 10.
An 8 out of 10 reflects that SAP BTP has been highly available for our workloads, with very few unplanned outages or major platform-side incidents impacting business users. Minor disruptions have occurred occasionally (for example, service-specific glitches or short maintenance windows), and they usually recover quickly, but this small level of risk and dependency on multiple cloud services keeps it just below a perfect score.
Rating performance a 10 reflects that, for our workloads, SAP BTP has been consistently fast and responsive across apps and integrations. Pages and Fiori/UI5 apps generally load quickly, APIs respond within acceptable times, and even more complex processes or reports complete without noticeably slowing down connected systems, as long as solutions are designed properly.

Integrating SAP Business Technology Platform

A 9 out of 10 reflects that integrating SAP BTP with other systems has generally been very smooth, especially for SAP-to-SAP scenarios using standard connectors, CDS/OData, and APIs. Once the initial security, destinations, and connectivity are in place, new integrations can be delivered quickly and reliably; the only reason it is not a 10 is that more complex non-SAP or legacy endpoints still demand strong technical skills and careful design.
  • Servicenow
  • S/4 HANA System
  • SAP On-Prem ECC System
The integrations go beyond simple data exchange and support end-to-end processes across systems like ServiceNow, S/4HANA, and SAP ECC. Using standard connectors, APIs, and destinations in BTP, the technical setup was moderate in difficulty: not trivial, but very manageable with the right skills in integration, security, and endpoint configuration.
  • CRM
  • HR
  • Legacy Applications
Yes, there are a few more systems we plan to integrate with using SAP BTP. On the roadmap are deeper integrations with HR and CRM platforms, some legacy line‑of‑business apps, and additional external APIs, so that approvals, data flows, and reporting can be orchestrated end‑to‑end from BTP rather than via manual exports or point‑to‑point scripts.
  • Single Signon
  • API (e.g. SOAP or REST)
Yes. In addition to the listed options, we also use SAP BTP with webhook-style callbacks and event-driven integrations, where external systems publish or subscribe to events instead of only calling APIs. We also leverage OData services heavily for UI5 and Fiori apps, which is another important integration pattern not explicitly called out in the list.
Focus first on getting the foundations right: destinations, authentication/SSO, and network connectivity, and standardize them so all integrations reuse the same patterns. Whenever possible, prefer standard APIs, events, and connectors over custom point‑to‑point logic, and invest in good monitoring and error handling so integration issues are visible early instead of being discovered by end users.

Relationship with SAP

An 8 out of 10 reflects that the SAP sales team was generally professional, responsive, and willing to clarify technical and commercial details without too much back-and-forth. There were a few typical enterprise-sales delays around approvals and aligning the exact licensing model, but overall the process was smooth enough that it felt positive rather than frustrating.
A 9 out of 10 reflects that working with SAP after the sale has been very smooth overall. Account and customer success teams are accessible, help connect us with the right technical experts, and follow through on issues or roadmap discussions, with only minor delays or escalation steps keeping it from being a perfect 10.
An 8 out of 10 reflects that the SAP professional services team brought solid expertise and helped us accelerate key parts of our BTP setup and initial projects. They were particularly useful for architecture decisions and complex integrations, though some knowledge transfer and documentation could have gone deeper and required follow‑up from our internal team, which is why it is not rated higher.
The main items we could negotiate were around pricing, consumption commitments, and some flexibility in ramp-up. We were able to agree on discounts tied to a multi‑year term, clarify how BTP credits and services could be rebalanced during the contract, and secure reasonable terms for adding more subaccounts and services as our usage grows.
A 7 out of 10 reflects that the overall pricing and contract structure for SAP BTP is acceptable but not straightforward. The flexibility of consumption-based models and multi‑year discounts is positive, yet the complexity of metrics, services, and forecasting usage makes it harder to predict costs and requires ongoing effort to keep spend under control.
Have a clear roadmap and usage forecast before commercial discussions, so you can challenge proposals and pick the right licensing model instead of just accepting a standard package. Build a good relationship with both the account manager and technical contacts, and document key agreements and follow-ups in writing so expectations, responsibilities, and timelines stay aligned over the long term.

Upgrading SAP Business Technology Platform

  • Side by Side Extensions
  • AI Core
  • SAP Build
  • Easy RPT Based interface
  • Easy Identity integration on Custom Apps
  • Easy Multitenant applications

SAP BTP Use Cases

I have seen and used at least one use case
  • SAP.com
  • Blogs
  • GitHub
  • Discovery Center
Our primary SAP BTP use case is a “Service Request and Approval Hub” built on BTP to orchestrate workflows across SAP ECC/S4, ServiceNow, and other systems. It provides a Fiori/UI5 front end where users can create and track requests, while BTP handles approvals, integrations, and notifications in the background so processes run end‑to‑end without emails and manual follow‑ups.​
Both - Yes, overall both the documentation and the pre-built software content were reasonably easy to use. The learning curve is there, but once the basic BTP concepts are clear, the tutorials, samples, and guided steps make it quite straightforward to follow along and adapt the content to real scenarios.
The documentation could be improved by adding more end‑to‑end, real‑world implementation examples that cut across multiple BTP services instead of focusing on one service at a time. Clearer “architectural blueprints” and more opinionated best‑practice guidance for topics like multi‑subaccount design, security, and operations would also make it easier for teams to move from tutorials to production.
SAP could deliver more value by expanding the pre-built content into richer, end-to-end reference scenarios that span multiple BTP services and common business processes. More configuration “variants” (for different industries and sizes), better documentation on how to extend/modify the content safely, and tighter integration with monitoring and lifecycle tools would also help teams move faster from pilot to production.

Comments

More Reviews of SAP Business Technology Platform