Selenium review
January 08, 2022
Selenium review
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Selenium
With Selenium, we used both UI and backend Rest services automation. Which is drastically spent on resources rather than automation tools. With Selenium, both frameworks are good and easy to approach and maintain. All test data and link the Jira user story dynamically passed through CI/CD pipeline and updated test case status directly in Jira. Which is an awesome framework built using Selenium and I recommend this to use all other projects.
- Easily maintain all types of testing with tags.
- Integration with CI/CD pipeline.
- Parallel test preparation while story is in dev progress.
- Easy to integrate with other tools such as Jenkins and team city.
- Little hard to compare image testing with images.
- It should have a standalone IDE for business users/nontechnical users to do the automation.
- It should have record and playback feature.
- It should support all kind of applications (SAP and Mainframe).
- CI/CD.
- Open source.
- Framework at POM.
- Less cost on Selenium.
- Coverage for all web application across organization.
- Need an UI for non-technical users.
- Worksoft Connective Automation Platform and Micro Focus UFT One (formerly HP UFT)
Customers are always spending less cost on tools and prefer open-source tools which leverage all applications Can be tailored your framework in selenium according to application Moreover CI/CD pipeline is easy in selenium compared to other tools Can be built custom test results reports in selenium Can maintain both API and UI and can be executed both test cases in the same pipeline which is now available in selenium.
Do you think Selenium delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Selenium's feature set?
Yes
Did Selenium live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Selenium go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Selenium again?
Yes