Good value for cost users quickly adapted to Tungsten from prior program.
Overall Satisfaction with Tungsten Power PDF
Purchased two licenses to test the feasibility of replacing Adobe with Kofax. The test went great; users stated that Kofax is faster and easier to use than Adobe. We plan to replace all Adobe licenses with Kofax, resulting in a $6,000 annual savings. Our users primarily use the software to edit PDFs and sign documents.
Pros
- Signing documents.
- Editing PDFs.
- OCR
Cons
- OCR should not require so many clicks.
- Editing PDFs is hidden behind ribbon clicks.
- Moved to save money from Adobe.
- ROI was immediate as purchase cost equaled Adobe annual cost.
- I don't understand the volume licenses; there isn't a "release" from the license, only an uninstall feature.
The program freezes for 5-10 seconds (experienced on various PC's and users and two different versions) the first time you try to copy text from the document. Clicking finish after making a PDF searchable or recognize text seems odd and unnecessary. I think the Tungsten should simply do the action, then wait for the next instruction.
I asked a CFO group for recommendations, and selected Tungsten from their recommendations. It worked well and was within our cost range, so I didn't evaluate anything further. CFOLC was the group.
Do you think Tungsten Power PDF delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Tungsten Power PDF's feature set?
Yes
Did Tungsten Power PDF live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Tungsten Power PDF go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Tungsten Power PDF again?
Yes
We are simple users of PDF editors, we needed something for simple comments, callouts, text changes, signatures (copy and paste an image). This fits our simple needs.


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation