Stable platform for Virtualization and RDS
January 28, 2026
Stable platform for Virtualization and RDS

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Windows Server
We use Windows Server's RDS as our platform for cloud application deployment to our customers. We also use HyperV virtualization to host additional Windows Servers as well as linux servers.
Pros
- RDS
- HyperV
- SMB file shares
Cons
- Better unity between hyperV management tools
- licensing is sometimes hard to understand
- Licensing for our needs has been reasonable compared to other commercial hypervisor vendors and has saved us quite a bit in our particular use case anyhow.
- Uptime has been good, reducing support costs
Familiar interface thus easy to adopt. Licensing costs are better than other commercial virtualization vendors at least for our hardware/needs.
Do you think Windows Server delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Windows Server's feature set?
Yes
Did Windows Server live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Windows Server go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Windows Server again?
Yes
Windows Server Feature Ratings
Using Windows Server
8 - end users to administrators, all use the server via RDS. Administrators use it at the console.
3 - Level 1 and level 2 technicians, system administrators. Training and experience with windows, active directory, virtualization.
- Remote access to LOB applications
- File Shares
- HyperV virtualization
- nothing unexpected or new
- Currently RDS, file shares and virtualization are the only planned uses
Evaluating Windows Server and Competitors
- Integration with Other Systems
No changes in evaluation process
Using Windows Server
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Easy to use Well integrated Convenient Feel confident using | Slow to learn Lots to learn |
- user setup, AD
- Hyper-V
- SMB shares
- federation
- hybrid environment

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation