Should have stayed with WizeHive!
May 08, 2020

Should have stayed with WizeHive!

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with WizeHive Zengine

We used WizeHive to manage our call for awards and abstracts. Using WizeHive to collect, review, and report on 6 calls a year.
  • Easy to use for staff.
  • Reporting.
  • Uses flash.
  • Difficult to load.
  • Cost effective.
  • Quick for staff.
Although Planstone was suggested to us as a more robust system than WizeHive, it was actually more difficult to use and did not meet our needs. We regret leaving WizeHive for Planstone.
We didn’t really use their support. I wish they would have told us more about the fact they were changing to get rid of the flash player as that was the main reason we left.

Do you think WizeHive Zengine delivers good value for the price?


Are you happy with WizeHive Zengine's feature set?


Did WizeHive Zengine live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of WizeHive Zengine go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy WizeHive Zengine again?


WizeHive is a cost effective way to run a call for awards for small non-profits. The only problems we had were when we outgrew the system. When we had calls for awards where we had over 100 applicants it became more difficult to use the program and our reviewers had a hard time viewing the applications since they use flash.