Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik - no idea what it means but it does deliver excellent group financial reporting.
April 04, 2022

Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik - no idea what it means but it does deliver excellent group financial reporting.

Adam Jenkinson | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

Used for management reporting and financial statement preparation. The product is critical for multicurrency consolidation and reporting for the entity, regional, and group structures. We have c.20 reporting entities and users.
  • Report customisation.
  • Drill down.
  • Excel compatibility.
  • Consolidation and close.
  • Online help and manual is a bonus but could be improved e.g. the clarity of English explanations.
  • Improved Excel compatibility e.g. formula driven reporting and dash boarding.
  • Mobile phone connectivity e.g. launching a consolidation from a Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik app.
  • Dimension configurability.
  • Security model.
  • Report writing.
  • Excel integration.
  • Fast close and soft close features enable pre reporting result improvement.
  • Budget and forecast cycles greatly improved on previous spreadsheet model.
Similar, but with key strengths (report formats and online help and support) and some shortfalls (e.g. HFM ad-hoc reporting and smart view tools are better than those in Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik). On balance, taking into account licensing and the full cost of ownership, Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik is a very strong contender with a number of USP advantages over HFM.

Do you think Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik's feature set?

Yes

Did Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik again?

Yes

Foxit PDF Editor (FoxitPhantom)
Well suited for large multi-entity international, multi-currency, multi GAAP groups with excellent report writing features, customizations, and validation traps with minimal IT support. The ability to customize dimensions and dimension structures is a key strength. The intuitive user interface enables easy adoption by new users and training times are short. Upload features via embedded customisable ETL and standardised Excel templates are very efficient. Error checking is intuitive and helpful. Less appropriate for small single entity businesses.

Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik Feature Ratings

Long-term financial planning
Not Rated
Financial budgeting
10
Forecasting
9
Scenario modeling
Not Rated
Management reporting
10
Financial data consolidation
10
Journal entries and reports
10
Multi-currency management
10
Intercompany Eliminations
10
Minority Ownership
Not Rated
Local and consolidated reporting
10
Detailed Audit Trails
10
Financial Statement Reporting
10
Management Reporting
10
Excel-based Reporting
8
Automated board and financial reporting
Not Rated
XBRL support for regulatory filing
Not Rated
Personalized dashboards
8
Color-coded scorecards
Not Rated
KPIs
Not Rated
Cost and profitability analysis
8
Key Performance Indicator setting
Not Rated
Benchmarking with external data
Not Rated
Flat file integration
10
Excel data integration
8
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources
Not Rated
Pixel Perfect reports
9
Customizable dashboards
Not Rated
Report Formatting Templates
10
Drill-down analysis
8
Formatting capabilities
8
Integration with R or other statistical packages
Not Rated
Report sharing and collaboration
8
Publish to Web
Not Rated
Publish to PDF
10
Report Versioning
7
Report Delivery Scheduling
10
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)
6
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization
Not Rated
Predictive Analytics
Not Rated
Multi-User Support (named login)
10
Role-Based Security Model
10
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)
10
Single Sign-On (SSO)
10
Responsive Design for Web Access
9
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile
Not Rated