Acendre vs. ChartHop

The analysis of the labor profile of the possible candidates is one of the reasons to continue using Acendre as the main platform for hiring. We are always carrying out constant analyzes of job profiles and our vacancies, it is generated that Acendre is increasingly used to meet our goals. The risks of bad hiring were the main reason to acquire this tool because previously we did not have an appropriate scope to the best talents, with this software we have improved our experience and also the experience of the applicants to our vacancies, this continues to motivate me to recommend it.

Incentivized

Not Suited - The tool is suited for organizations with an employee count of more than >500. There are much cheaper tools out there for a company size of below 500 employees. Integration with other tools can be improved. Suited - From an admin POV who sometimes works closely with HRs, customization and storing information is great.

Incentivized

• Analysis of the labor profile of possible talents.
• Reduces the work time of the talent management administration.

Incentivized

• The org chart is very easy to use
• It can be integrated into other things like internal company websites
• The UI looks nice

Incentivized

• With Acendre you can achieve the labor objectives of specific hiring faster and without common mistakes. The human resources department is very satisfied with this tool because they have reduced the work time of the hirings, this generates a positive change in the way of working.

Incentivized

• It took us a lot of time to implement and onboard this tool. Though we love the tool now, the onboarding could have been smoother.
• UI looks outdated, room for improvement. Difficult to navigate.

Incentivized

For teams and people who have enough time to learn the platform or enough patience to read through documentation or to watch through tutorials, the platform is pretty usable and it is relatively easy to pick up new concepts and how to do certain things, specifically around self-service if there is some problem. With that being said, the platform can sometimes be inherently unintuitive with certain edge cases

Incentivized

ChartHop is generally better than these products because of its usability and clarity of documentation. Our use cases can be very specific sometimes, so for example ChartHop is intuitively better for org charts and smaller organizational visualizations. There is also more support for workflow creations. There is special attention to making sure there are not too many functions and things that can confuse the user compared to the other products.

Incentivized

• Reduce hiring errors.
• The working time is shorter than the Acendre implementation.

Incentivized

• This relationship is not as clear
• When comparing this service to others, it may simply be a matter of preference
• This visualization platform is only a way to enables ideas that will increase things like ROI. I don't see it as something that impacts revenue.

Incentivized