Amazing Experience That Still Holds Up
Overall Satisfaction with ChartHop
We use ChartHop for general visualizations for proof of concepts, newer ideas that are less mature in their development and also for more pitch-focused objectives that involve executive audiences. We also use this product for straightforward org chart development. The scope of our scale deals with gigabyte-level data and our audience is in the hundreds as to who sees our visualizations.
Pros
- Easy chart manipulation
- Good color schemas
- Readable fonts that those who can't see as well can see
Cons
- When org charts or other visualizations get really big, the UI gets very buggy
- Sometimes the platform will randomly lag or will automatically refresh and I will lose progress
- Can sometimes be difficult for new users to learn due to new features that have been added. Lots to try and learn.
- This relationship is not as clear
- When comparing this service to others, it may simply be a matter of preference
- This visualization platform is only a way to enables ideas that will increase things like ROI. I don't see it as something that impacts revenue.
ChartHop is generally better than these products because of its usability and clarity of documentation. Our use cases can be very specific sometimes, so for example ChartHop is intuitively better for org charts and smaller organizational visualizations. There is also more support for workflow creations. There is special attention to making sure there are not too many functions and things that can confuse the user compared to the other products.
Do you think ChartHop delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with ChartHop's feature set?
Yes
Did ChartHop live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of ChartHop go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy ChartHop again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation